Last summer, my flight to Nantucket was diverted to Boston, fog thick enough to ground half the runway. An older man and I shared an Uber to Hyannis, only to discover we’d both missed the last ferry. We found separate hotels. The next morning we bumped into each other again at the dock. By breakfast, with coffee cooling between us and the harbor slowly coming awake, we’d stopped talking like strangers.

When boarding began, I stepped out of line for a moment. By the time I got back, he’d disappeared into the crowd. I looked for him once we were on the ferry but never found him again.

Some people lose each other in airports.

I lost mine on a ferry.

My friend Dilshad Ali lost hers somewhere over Ohio. She spent an hour talking with the man beside her on a flight. They wandered into autism and what it means to raise a child the world doesn’t quite know how to accommodate. Then his wife handed him a book to pass the time.

Dilshad picked up her own book: When Islam Is Not a Religion.

He looked at the cover, said nothing, and somewhere between one page and the next, the conversation quietly came to an end.

If you’ve traveled enough, you’ve probably had a conversation like that. You leave knowing less about what someone does than what keeps them awake at night. Then the cabin doors open, the spell breaks, and everyone drifts toward a different gate.

Recently, Vivek Murthy suggested that airplanes and other liminal spaces should become places of deliberate solitude or connection again. Put away the laptop, read a book, let your mind wander. Or notice the stranger beside you. Sometimes the best use of an empty hour is another human being.

There is a category in Islamic law for someone like this. Ibn al-sabil, the son of the road. For this stretch of the journey, the wayfarer has been separated from the ordinary web of people and places that would otherwise sustain him. Because of that separation, he acquires a claim on the care of others—enough to see him safely home. Once he arrives, the claim disappears. The need belonged to the road.

The Prophetic teachings say something similar about guests. A host owes hospitality for three days. After that, what remains is generosity freely given rather than expected. The teaching never assumes the guest will stay. It simply recognizes that two lives have overlapped for a little while, and that this, by itself, is enough to ask something of us.

When I wrote recently that we should talk to our seatmates, the responses surprised me. People told stories about conversations that only made sense years later. The stranger who became a colleague. The woman who unexpectedly turned out to know your cousin. The chance encounter that returned years later in another city. Looking back, they realized an ordinary flight hadn’t been ordinary after all.

Those stories pointed, almost by contrast, to all the others. For every encounter that circles back years later, there must be dozens that simply disappear into memory. We step off the plane convinced nothing came of the encounter, never knowing what, if anything, it quietly left behind.

Psychologists Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder have found that people consistently expect they’d rather be left alone on trains and buses. Afterwards, they report being happier when they talked to the stranger beside them instead.

One reader pushed back when I encouraged people to talk to their seatmates. Strangers don’t choose where they sit on an airplane, he reminded me, and they can’t easily leave if a conversation becomes unwelcome. I think that’s a fair caution. I’ve spent a flight nodding politely while the man beside me recounted his life after becoming a born-again Christian, pausing every few minutes to ask whether I’d ever considered following the same path. By the time he was lamenting how all the wrong people were taking over the country, I found myself watching the little airplane creep across the seatback map, willing it to move faster.

The problem wasn’t that we disagreed. The problem was that I had nowhere to take the conversation except where he wanted it to go. No one is entitled to another person’s attention. A conversation should always remain an invitation.

Even so, I suspect some of our hesitation comes from somewhere else. We want certainty before we say hello. We’d like to know, before we open ourselves to another person, that the hour won’t be wasted.

Life rarely offers that kind of certainty.

The traveler doesn’t arrive with a promise that he’ll become part of your life. The guest doesn’t come with any assurance of what comes next. All you know is that, for a little while, this person has been placed in your care.

It’s tempting to wonder whether certain people were meant to enter our lives. The older teachings ask a different question: Now that they have, how will you receive them?

I still think about breakfast in Hyannis, the salt air drifting across the dock as strangers became companions for a morning. Sometimes I think about the conversation Dilshad had over Ohio that ended when a man lowered his eyes to the cover of a book and let the moment pass.

Breakfast ended. The ferry docked. The plane landed.

Like the traveler, like the guest, they belonged to us only for the length of the journey.

Subscribe now

The first thing my cat did, on the day we moved into a near-stranger’s house, was insult the resident.

Harry came out of his carrier, took one slow look around a living room that plainly belonged to another animal, and stretched out in the best patch of sun as though he had paid the mortgage. From under the couch, two outraged eyes watched him do it.

That was Rico. Rico did not care for other cats. The ones in his neighborhood had chased and swatted him for years, and he had concluded, not unreasonably, that his own kind could not be trusted. He was wary of most people too, and openly grumpy with the rest, a cat who had decided the world was against him and saw no reason to hide it.

“He isn’t really a people person,” said the woman whose house we had just invaded, watching the standoff with the calm of someone who had seen him sulk before. “Or a cat person.” Which is a strange thing to say about a cat, and turned out to be exactly true.

We were in that house because ours was not finished yet. It was being built from the ground up, and the move-in date kept sliding, a week, then another, because it was the middle of the pandemic and the workers kept falling sick.

The woman watching my cat make himself at home was, at that point, someone I had never really met. We knew each other through a phone, a long thread of WhatsApp messages and the small bright squares of social media. I had met her husband once, years earlier, but her I knew the way you know someone who lives entirely on a screen. We had lived ten minutes apart for years and never once stood in the same room.

When our plans for where to wait out the construction fell through, twice, she sent the message I have not stopped turning over since.

Come stay with us. All of you. Bring the cat.

The cats, it turned out, were the smallest thing she had taken on. Not everyone would have opened their home to a whole family, least of all then. Because of Covid, people had pulled their families behind closed doors and learned to flinch at a stranger in a hallway, and into that fear she opened hers to a household she had only ever met through a screen. I have been on the other side of need enough times to know how rare that is.

My last piece was about the way friendship can sour, about people who collect friends the way others collect grievances, always keeping a tally. This is the other half of that story, the one with no tally in it at all. She just opened a door.

One reader of that piece pointed me toward Aristotle, who says you cannot truly know someone until you have eaten a great deal of salt together. Friendship cannot be hurried. The wish for it comes quickly, he wrote. The thing itself comes slowly.

Ours began in reverse. She did not take us in because we were close. We grew close because she took us in. The salt we were meant to eat slowly, over years, we ate all at once, at her table, every night for a month. The welcome came first. The friendship is what it left behind.

There is a teaching that runs in both directions. To give while expecting something back is not really to give, it only turns the gift into a loan. And to rush to repay is its own quiet refusal, a way of clearing the books so you do not have to carry what you were handed. Real generosity keeps no ledger at either end.

The Qur’an puts it in the mouths of the righteous, the ones who feed the hungry and then say, we feed you only for the face of God, wanting no reward from you, and no thanks. No reward, not even thanks.

My tradition has a word for it, karim. We translate it as generous, but it shares a root with karama, dignity, as if to give freely and to be noble were never two things. Al-Karim is a name of God, the One who gives before we ask and keeps no record of what comes back. To be karim is to carry a small flame of that, an open hand with no tally in the other, able to give that way, and to receive that way too, without ever counting what you owe.

Somewhere in the second or third week, I caught myself reaching for the right drawer for a spoon without thinking, the way you only do in a kitchen that is yours. It was not mine, but my hands had stopped believing that. Her spoons had become my spoons, and she had made it look like nothing at all.

I have thought about what we owed her, and the truth is that the debt was never the point. What we wanted was to be the kind of guests who are a gift and not a weight, to fold into her days without bending them out of shape.

Some evenings we arranged dinner for the whole house, not to pay anything down but because feeding people is a happy thing to do. The same meal can be a debt repaid or a gift freely given, and the difference is never in the food. It is in what the heart means by it.

Her husband and my son found their own friendship. Eesa was ten that year, and somewhere in those weeks he stopped behaving like a guest. The surest sign was the drink fridge. He had discovered they kept it stocked with Brisk iced tea, which he loved and we never bought at home, and he began helping himself to cans with the easy confidence of a boy in his own kitchen. Her husband loved the stuff just as much, and he took the raids not as a liberty but as the beginning of something. The two of them would crack open their cans and talk like a couple of old men who went back years.

It has become ordinary to keep our homes shut behind us, and there is real safety in that, never more than in the year I am describing. But there is a loss folded inside it, too. There may be no older way of turning strangers into family than handing them the run of your house, and a door that opens that far has become rare, rare enough that it startled me.

There was nothing performed in what she did. No one watched. There was no post, no audience, not even a photograph of all of us crowded around her table. There was only the table, and the food, and room made for us in a life that was already full.

Rico held out about a week. He hissed, Harry ignored him. He hid, Harry waited outside the hiding place like a fool in love. Then one morning I came down to find the two of them asleep in the same square of sun Harry had claimed on the first day, Rico’s paw thrown over his back as if none of the old grievances had ever happened. My friend stood in the doorway and watched them for a while. “I have never once seen him do that,” she said.

Rico trusted almost no one, cat or human, and he had his reasons. Harry gave him no say in the matter. They were shut under one roof, and the roof did the rest. Rico is gone now, a few years gone, and in his whole wary life Harry was the only cat he ever let close.

It is more or less what happened to the woman whose spoons I borrowed and me. A screen had kept us at arm’s length, two people who lived close enough to meet and somehow never did. Then a door opened, and the shared walls did the rest.

We live in the same neighborhood now. The house all that construction was inching toward turned out to be a few minutes from hers, and the screen we used to live behind is mostly gone. When I want to see her now, I hop over.

I have told her, more than once, that she and her husband will always have a place in our hearts that belongs to no one else. I used to think I was thanking her. I understand now that I was doing something else. You cannot pay a gift like that back without turning it into the loan it never was. You can only carry it.

And we do. The salt we ate in that house turned a voice on a screen into family.

Subscribe now

At a dinner last winter, the person next to me leaned in, warm, almost tender, and said in a voice meant only for me, “Between us, I don’t think she really belongs in this group.” The centerpiece was too tall and we had been tilting around it all night to see each other. I remember that for half a second, before anything else arrived, I felt the little electric lift of being picked, of finding myself suddenly inside the velvet rope. The shame came later, the way it does.

I have thought about that half second more than I would like to admit, because it finally handed me a word for a kind of person I had been watching for years without ever quite naming.

You have probably met one. Not the lonely figure at the edge of the party but the opposite, the one at the center of it, genuinely good with people, whose circle never stops widening. Every season brings new names, folded in, hugged hello, made to feel chosen. From the outside it can look like a kindness to everyone, one person warm enough to gather a whole community into a single room.

But gathering people is not the same as loving them, and beneath all that warmth there is a ledger. The hands that pull you in are the same ones that decide, later, who stays close and who gets eased toward the edge. It happens in small print. A cooler hello. An inside joke you are suddenly not told. A dinner you only hear about afterward, from someone who assumed you had been there.

Collecting and gatekeeping turn out to be one gesture, because the only way to own who is inside is to keep ruling on who is not, and a community that should be a single piece of cloth begins to come apart, thread-by-thread.

A few weeks after that dinner, a friend called me. She was working to sound light about it. She wanted to know whether she had done something wrong, because there had been a gathering she was not asked to, a coolness she could not place, a door that had shut without anyone admitting it was a door. “I’m sure I’m imagining it,” she said, and laughed, and then she was quiet, and we both sat there knowing she was not imagining it. I had nothing useful to say. I still don’t.

My tradition has an old, heavy word for what was moving underneath all of this. Fitna. It does not come over cleanly into English, but it points at something like discord, the deliberate stirring of division between people, and Islam takes it more seriously than a long list of sins we are quicker to name.

There is a teaching I keep returning to, that mending what has broken between two people is worth more than years of prayer and fasting, and that the opposite, letting it fester, turning people against each other, is the thing that shaves away your faith the way a blade takes hair. We are warned, again and again, about the one who carries words from house-to-house, who keeps one face for you and another for the person they are quietly turning you against. The warnings are severe because the damage is so soft-footed. You almost never see it as it happens. You see, much later, that the room has split.

Arthur Brooks has a plainer vocabulary for one corner of this. There are real friends, he says, and there are deal friends.

• Deal friends are the ones the friendship is secretly for something, even when that something is just the pleasant hum of being well-connected.

• Real friends are useless. They do nothing for you but love you.

The person who collects and divides has, in an awful way, mastered the deal friend, turned people into a kind of currency to be gathered and, when it serves, spent.

There is a line in the Qur’an that says on the day that finally matters, friends will become enemies to one another, every last one of them, except those who loved each other for the sake of God. I once read that as being only about the next world. I think now it describes this one just as well. Love someone for what they give you, and the friendship is already half an enemy. It just hasn’t shown it yet.

I could stop here, with one villain and a circle of victims, and it would feel righteous and clean. It would also be false. There is always that half second at the dinner. The pull. Before the shame, there was the flush of being chosen. Part of me wanted in.

Most of us are not the collector. That tireless, dividing hunger is genuinely rare, and we ought to say so plainly rather than pretend everyone is a villain in waiting. But the seed of it is completely ordinary. I have felt it in the small, delicious piece of gossip that buys a little closeness with whoever I pass it to. I have felt it inside my best friendships, on an ordinary afternoon, being faintly transactional, or petty, or glad to have been chosen. We think we are the real ones. Mostly we are. And on the bad days we are keeping the collector’s ledger too, in smaller figures, under a gentler name.

The answer is not to grow suspicious of warm people, or to start auditing our friendships for purity, which is its own kind of cold. It is smaller than that, and harder. You feel the half second when it comes, and you do not move with it. You do not carry the sentence to the next person. You say, at the dinner, lightly, “Actually, I like her,” and you let it cost you a little standing. You try, in a room that has its dividers, to be one of the menders instead.

I never did call that friend back with anything wise. But I did one small thing. I asked her to dinner, no group, no gatekeeper, nobody to be inside or outside of. We talked for three hours. Somewhere in there, she stopped performing being fine, and I stopped performing having answers, and we were just two people who had been bruised by the same thing, telling each other the truth.

That is the thing all the collecting in the world cannot give you. One real table, a seat at it for anybody worn out from being sorted.

Leave a comment

Years ago in Dubai, my friend Mariam told me her country had just appointed its first Minister of Happiness.

“A Minister of Happiness?” I said, with more incredulity than was strictly kind.

Mariam gave me a look. Ours is a friendship that can hold some weight, so she told me directly not to be obnoxious about it, with a smirk that was half serious and entirely on my side.

My incredulity had a logic, or what passed for one. A cabinet post for a feeling struck me as indulgent, the kind of over-the-top gesture Dubai specializes in, a city that gilds everything it touches. Americans, I assumed, were not that type. We would never treat happiness as a thing to be managed.

The joke was on me. A decade later the United States has no Minister of Happiness, but only because we skipped the ministry and went straight for the management. We built the happiness labs at Yale and Harvard. We made a course on happiness, the most popular course in Yale’s history. We downloaded happiness apps by the millions. Piece-by-piece, we assembled an entire private happiness industry, all of it aimed at engineering a single feeling, even as the research keeps finding that the harder we chase happiness the more it backs away.

So Mariam was right to wave off my smugness. The country I found indulgent was at least honest about the project, naming it out loud and giving it a title. Mine pretended to be above all that while managing happiness harder than anyone, one app and one syllabus at a time.

It’s not only happiness we get wrong. Somewhere in those same years, quietly, we started talking to one another less.

A new study by two psychologists, Valeria Pfeifer and Matthias Mehl, set out to count how many words people speak in a day and found something they were not looking for. Their data came from more than two thousand people, ages ten to ninety-four, most of them American, recorded across twenty-two studies between 2005 and 2019. Each year, those people spoke about 338 fewer words a day than the year before, a steady downward slide across the whole period. The daily average fell from around 16,000 in the mid-2000s to 12,700 by 2019. More than a quarter of our talking, gone, with no announcement when it left.

It is the shape of the loss that gets me. These weren’t only the long talks with the people we love. They were the small ones, too. The question to the cashier. The hello in the elevator. The stranger you used to stop for directions, before the little blue dot on a phone’s map took over the asking.

David Byrne, of all people, called it years ago. In an essay titled “Eliminating the Human,” the Talking Heads frontman argued that one convenience at a time, technology was removing the people from our days. We used to talk to a teller; now we talk to a screen.

It all arrived under the banner of ease. And some of the friction it carried off happened to be the contact.

The friction has a new solvent now. Laurie Santos, the Yale psychologist behind that oversubscribed happiness course, says the quiet part out loud: the chatbots are always there, and they never judge you. Children are having their first romantic relationships with them.

Every frictionless exchange can make the next human one, with its bad timing and its capacity to wound, a little harder to begin. In one experiment, strangers waited in a room, some with phones and some without, and the ones with phones smiled at each other thirty percent less. We have not just stopped talking as much. We have stopped looking up.

We have decided friction is the enemy of a good life, and I suspect we have it backward. A neuroscientist named Jim Coan gave a commencement speech this spring titled “You Are a Pain in the Ass.” Community, he told the graduates, is not the same as harmony. Real connection comes with friction built in, the inconvenience of other people, their needs and interruptions and refusal to be streamlined.

That friction is not the fee you pay for belonging, Coan says. It is the belonging. We become ourselves against the resistance of one another.

Which is what makes those 338 lost words feel less like a statistic than a tally. Sociologists call the people at the edges of our lives, the barista, the neighbor who knows your name, our “weak ties,” a term Mark Granovetter coined in 1973, and one that undersells them to the point of insult.

It might be more accurate to say that these connections confirm, under no obligation, that we exist to a world beyond our own front door. You can be loved at home, surrounded even, and still go unrecognized everywhere else, a stranger in your own neighborhood, unseen in the places where no one is required to notice you.

I write here about the architecture of care, and until now I have mostly meant the people closest in, the family in the next room, the friend who answers at midnight. The weak ties are a reminder that there is a wider architecture, too, and the hello is load-bearing. Pull a few hundred small words out of a day, and a person can fall out of public view, while every close relationship stays perfectly intact.

This summer, home and unhurried for the first time in months, I am choosing the friction on purpose. I talk to the woman at the register instead of tapping my card in silence. I let the line move slowly and leave my phone in my bag, asking the man ahead of me about the sheet cake he is buying rather than auditing the lost minutes. And when a tourist looks lost, I stop and give the directions out loud, the old way, before the blue dot can beat me to it.

I am, I suspect, a mild pain in the ass to people who could have finished in silence. It is among the better things I have to offer, and the thing I most want offered back.

A Minister of Happiness was never the absurd part. The absurd part is the belief we put in her place, that happiness is something you optimize alone, frictionlessly, on a screen, rather than something built through the friction of real life itself.

The cold tea. The conversation that runs long past its natural ending because neither of you wants to be the one to leave. The smirk of a friend who loves you enough to tell you to stop being obnoxious.

I should call Mariam. Not text. Call.

This post was published at Deseret News.

Leave a comment

A friend told me yesterday that he is retardmaxxing.

I have to deal with the word first. It borrows language once used to demean people with intellectual disabilities and repackages it as a philosophy, which is its own small cruelty even when no harm is intended. My friend does not mean it cruelly. He picked it up the way people pick up all kinds of internet debris, because it was funny, because it floated past at the right moment, because it named a feeling. Still, the word is not free. I will use it because he used it, and because what sits underneath it is worth taking seriously.

Here is what he meant by it.

He spent his early years as an academic, the way I am living mine now. He read difficult things, argued about them, and believed, the way you must believe to do that work, that the arguments mattered. Then he left academia almost by accident and entered the corporate world. He found he was very good at it. The money was real. The ladder was real. The rewards arrived in the steady, legible way academic rewards almost never do. He climbed.

Then his father became severely ill, and something in him stopped long enough to look around.

What he saw was a hamster. A very accomplished hamster on a very expensive wheel, running. He had spent years optimizing his pace without ever asking where the wheel was taking him, because a wheel does not take you anywhere. His father’s illness did not expose his life as fraudulent. It simply interrupted the motion long enough for him to feel how dizzy he was, and to realize that the running itself had quietly become the entire content of his days.

So he decided to stop optimizing. Stop tracking. Stop consulting experts about every detail of his existence and waiting for permission before moving. He was going to “whoopsie” his way through life, as the gospel of retardmaxxing puts it, and figure things out as he went. He was choosing, deliberately, to become dumb about his own life, because the smart version had become the only version.

I understood him immediately, because something similar happened to me, and it happened early.

I had just graduated from law school. The future was beginning to harden into something definite, all forward motion and professional momentum. Then my father was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He died four months later.

There was no long season of preparation. Just the diagnosis, then a rapidly narrowing window, then the rest of my life on the other side of it.

I remember the smallness of those four months more than the size of them. A chair pulled close to a bed. The long hours of sleep, the silence, the vigil I kept in his room. Near the end, when he could no longer move anything else in his body, he prayed by blinking his eyes. That was what was left to him, and he used it. A man reduced to almost nothing, still turning what remained toward God.

I still do not have language clean enough to describe what that did to me. It rearranged the hierarchy of things. I had been living sealed, optimizing toward a future no one had promised me, and I had mistaken the trajectory for the life. Meanwhile the actual substance of living, the people, the presence, the irretrievable ordinary days, had been sitting quietly in the background the whole time, waiting to be noticed.

So when my friend described the hamster wheel, I did not hear a stranger naming something new. I heard someone naming a thing I had carried for years.

The family these words come from

The word my friend used has cousins.

There is looksmaxxing, the project of pushing your face and body to their genetic ceiling and beyond: jaw exercises, supplements, surgeries, endless tiny calibrations built on the belief that if you could perfect your appearance, the rest of life would follow.

And there is a gentler, more respectable cousin Frank Bruni wrote about recently in the New York Times. He calls it brainmaxxing: a culture obsessed with cognitive optimization, where Americans spend billions of dollars chasing sharper memory, better focus, protection against decline. Supplements, puzzles, diets, “brain health” regimens. Bruni jokes that his morning Wordle counts as mental calisthenics rather than procrastination.

Then he arrives at the real insight. Cognitive health, he writes, has become the next frontier of self-care. Maybe the brain is the new belly, another part of the self to tone, refine, perfect.

That is the family resemblance. Looksmaxxing perfects the body. Brainmaxxing perfects the mind. Retardmaxxing claims to reject the entire game.

But it does not fully escape it. It preserves the exact structure of the thing it rebels against. It still imagines life as a problem solvable through the correct optimization strategy. Only now the thing being optimized is thoughtlessness itself. The wheel is still a wheel when you decide to run on it backward.

All of them share the same hidden grammar. They treat life as a quantity to maximize. More beauty. More cognition. More detachment. The variable changes. The structure does not.

So the real question was never which thing to max. The real question is whether maxxing is the right shape for a life at all.

Janan got off the train

I keep thinking about my friend Janan Delgado, who had almost the same realization and reached almost the opposite conclusion.

Janan once described herself as the fastest train on the track. As a student in Cairo, she quietly disdained anything slow. Her favorite animal was the bee because bees worked hard and got things done. She would enter the PhD program of her choice, teach somewhere prestigious, publish important books. Keep up or move aside.

The world she entered kept confirming that this was the only train worth riding. When she mentioned that her sister was visiting, an advisor frowned and asked how long, because the last time family visited, she had fallen behind on her writing. When she got engaged and wanted to spend a year in Cairo with her husband, a professor warned her she would fall through the cracks. No congratulations. Just concern about momentum.

Then she had children.

And the self she had built, the sealed self capable of shutting out every competing demand and arriving at work like a single-bodied person, cracked apart. Her dissertation, which should have taken a few years, took ten. She watched colleagues graduate and move on while she felt herself slowing into someone unrecognizable to her former self.

She finished anyway. Her dissertation passed with distinction and later won first place across all of Harvard.

But the lesson she took from that experience was not that she had succeeded despite the slowness. It was that interrupted, encumbered, relational work can still be excellent work.

Her essay ends with a literal train ride. She missed her stop and woke up sixty miles beyond her station. Sitting on a bench in Trenton, crying, she realized something strange: she had been riding the slow regional line. If she had been on the fast express she spent most of her life admiring, the same mistake would have carried her ninety-five miles in the wrong direction. Speed, she writes, is appealing. It is also unforgiving.

Janan did not abolish thinking. She did something harder. She allowed care to reorganize her life around other people and accepted what it cost her in speed.

I got on the train Janan got off

I have to be honest about where I stand in all this, because it would be easy to tell this story as though I am the calm observer watching friends sort themselves out.

I am not. I am doing the thing.

I have spent my life pursuing what people used to call the “life of the mind,” and I recently pivoted into academia, which means I boarded roughly the train Janan stepped off. I give up a great deal for the privilege of reading, teaching, writing, and thinking seriously about questions I believe matter. I love it the way you love something you waited a long time for.

And if I am honest, there is a version of what I do that is simply smartmaxxing in more dignified clothing. Publications. Talks. A number I could spend my entire life pushing upward while calling it a vocation.

The easy answer is that my work is meaningful while my friend’s was empty. But that answer flatters me too much to trust it.

The real difference, I think, is whether the work turns a person outward or seals them inward.

My friend’s climb had become a sealed room. So had Janan’s train for a time. So had my own life before my father’s illness cracked it open.

The danger was never intelligence or effort themselves. The danger is becoming the kind of person who can shut out every demand except his own ambitions, who can move through the world as though he owes nothing and belongs to no one.

What I want, on my better days, is not optimization but orientation. I want a life in which learning opens outward, into students, readers, friends, a husband, children, a God I am trying to serve. A life where thought deepens my obligations to other people rather than insulating me from them.

That, I think, is what my father’s illness taught me, and what my friend’s father taught him without meaning to. Not that thinking is bad. My friend remains one of the smartest people I know and will remain smart no matter how aggressively he tries to “whoopsie” his way through life. What broke was not the mind but the seal around it.

Retardmaxxing is his attempt to break that seal with a sledgehammer. I understand the impulse. Sometimes a seal that tight seems to demand one. But you do not have to become dumb to become present. You only have to let other people rearrange you.

None of these are really ways of maxxing at all. Not beauty. Not intelligence. Not even meaning.

The better question is quieter than that.

Who are you for?

Everything I have come to believe tells me the answer was never a number. It was a direction. Outward, toward each other, which is slower and more porous and less controllable than optimization. It is also, I suspect, the only thing any of this was ever for.

Leave a comment

We don’t talk enough about men and work-life balance, not the way women have been talking about it for decades, with the same honesty and the same stakes. We have a whole vocabulary for what overwork costs women, what it costs families, what it costs the woman quietly managing everything at the margins. But the conversation about what total absorption into work costs men is much quieter. The friendships that dissolve, the children who learn not to interrupt, the self whittled down to professional function. That conversation tends to happen in softer rooms, if it happens at all.

A few weeks ago I was at a conference at Duke built around meaning, loneliness, and what it looks like to live well in a time when both feel harder to hold. Arthur Brooks was there and Iain McGilchrist was there, and it was the kind of conversation that follows you home on the plane and sits with you at the kitchen table for days.

Brooks has written about how men in America are unlikely to form new friendships after thirty, how work becomes not just what they do but who they are, the last remaining structure of identity. He has a phrase for the shallow relationships that fill the space, “deal friends,” built on transaction and utility rather than genuine sustenance. His worry is that we have normalized a version of male life in which depth gets steadily traded for productivity, and no one calls it loneliness because it doesn’t look like loneliness from the outside.

McGilchrist arrived somewhere nearby from a different direction. He talks about two kinds of attention, one narrow and grasping, oriented toward getting and using, the other open and patient, oriented toward connection and what actually matters. His worry is that we have built a world rewarding the first almost exclusively while quietly starving the second, and that meaning doesn’t come from optimizing your life but from staying genuinely present to it.

I flew home thinking about Shabbir.

He has returned to work, gradually, the way you ease back into cold water. A meeting here, a conversation there, the slow reopening of a professional self that had been suspended, not erased. Researchers who study cancer survivors say this is one of the most psychologically significant moments in recovery, not the end of treatment but the return to a role that tells you who you are outside of illness. You are more than a patient. Work, at its best, gives that back. And I can see it in him, the way his energy sharpens after a good call, the way a difficult problem seems almost nourishing.

But what the research also shows, and what feels true from lived experience, is that the person who returns to work after something like this is not the same person who left. Illness strips life down to its essentials. It clarifies, sometimes brutally, what was actually central and what only pretended to be. And the question that follows a survivor back into the office, whether they name it or not, is whether they can carry that clarity with them or whether the old grooves will quietly reopen.

For men especially, those grooves run deep. The culture has long treated professional absorption as a kind of nobility. He is focused, driven, carrying a lot. The hours disappear around him and this gets narrated as seriousness rather than partial absence. The home adapts, the children learn the shape of maybe later, and the woman across from him becomes, slowly, more infrastructure than companion. I watched versions of this in other families. I watched it, in different ways, in ours.

What illness did was interrupt that story without asking.

I’ve written about some of what shifted this past year. How I watched Shabbir become present in ways I had wanted for years and given up asking for. The year was enormous. And what gets clarified that way, you can’t unsee.

The question I find myself sitting with now is not whether Shabbir can do it, he can, but whether the reentry becomes a genuine new chapter or just a gradual slide back into old patterns dressed in new gratitude. I watch this with hope and wariness held together, and I think that’s the honest place to be.

Families are porous, and work doesn’t stay in its lane. It shapes the emotional weather of a house. This is why I’ve never been able to take the language of balance lightly, even when it gets used so casually it sounds like lifestyle branding. Balance is not a cute aspiration. It’s an ethical question about what kind of presence we owe each other.

I keep coming back to what McGilchrist was describing at that conference, that we can pay such narrow, consuming attention to one part of our lives that we lose access to the wider world that gives it meaning, that we mistake the getting and the doing for the thing itself. Women know something about the opposite of that, even without the language for it. We know what it is to think in fragments, to carry six lines of attention at once, to long for an hour not already claimed by someone else’s need and to watch a meaningful life quietly reduce itself to maintenance if we’re not careful.

After a year like ours, none of this feels abstract. It feels domestic. Marital. Spiritual, even.

I don’t have neat answers for what comes next. I only know that this season has made me suspicious of any version of success that requires us to become less available to wonder and to each other. Some evenings I watch Shabbir moving between things that once seemed impossible to hold together, work and recovery and fatherhood and the quiet pleasure of an ordinary day, and there is so much gratitude in that image alongside something in me that stays quietly attentive. Not fearfully. Just honestly.

Survivorship, I’ve come to understand, is not about returning to the person you were before. It’s about figuring out who you are now, and choosing carefully what gets to occupy the center.

Subscribe now

We were halfway through dinner when someone asked me to look back.

It was the day after my birthday, and the table was full of people who have known me across many versions of my life. At some point between the appetizers and dessert, Amina leaned forward and said gently, “How do you even think about this past year?”

I set down my fork. Just days after my birthday last year, my husband was diagnosed with leukemia, and everything since then has felt slightly off-axis, as if life tilted and never quite returned to level ground. There was no neat answer to her question, no summary that could do justice to the fear, the strange stretches of calm, the way time seemed to stretch and then snap back.

“I don’t know,” I said. “It’s hard to put into words.”

“What about him?” someone else asked, not unkindly. “How has this changed him? How has it changed your family?”

I found myself talking about things I hadn’t planned to say. Not the big moments, but the quiet revisions to everyday life.

For most of our marriage, we barely marked time. Birthdays passed with a mumbled acknowledgment, maybe a card left on the counter. Anniversaries slipped by unobserved. The children’s birthdays I managed and insisted on. Those we celebrated, because childhood deserves its ceremonies. But for us, days bled into one another, undifferentiated and unremarkable.

A few years ago, I put my foot down. Maybe it was a meltdown. Maybe it was clarity breaking through like light through a crack.

“We have to start commemorating the special moments,” I told him one evening after another forgotten anniversary had come and gone. “Otherwise, what is life about if we let each day dissolve into the next without marking where we’ve been?”

He looked up from his laptop, not quite understanding why it mattered so much to me, why we needed to celebrate at all.

The change came slowly, grudgingly at first, like turning a rusty wheel. Birthdays began to involve cards, small gestures, attention paid. Anniversaries became occasions rather than dates we’d already flipped past. It felt forced for a while, performative in a way that made me wonder if I’d asked for something artificial, something that couldn’t take root in soil that had gone hard from neglect.

But this year, something shifted.

This year, my birthday arrived with flowers he’d chosen himself, a dinner he’d arranged with kanafe and ice cream for dessert, a favorite. He has realized now that even this is a space for creative investment, that the choosing matters as much as the gesture itself. Our daughter Zaynab presented me with a two-tier Jellycat cake she’d made, a little smiling face on top with tiny feet sticking out the bottom, as if the cake were sitting there pleased with itself. Mikael gave me a small standing crocheted ice cream cone that reads, life is better with a sprinkle of you in it. Coming from Mikael, I knew each word was laden with intent and emotion. They sang to me, badly and joyfully, and when I looked at their faces, I saw recognition there. Perhaps even an admission that I had been right all along. That it was worth it. That marking time is not vanity, but survival.

“You see?” I wanted to say, but didn’t need to.

At the dinner table with friends, I tried to explain this.

“Before all of this, there were other patterns that felt just as fixed,” I said, reaching for my water glass. “Eesa would ask his dad to throw a football around or do something physical together. Not a big commitment. Just time.”

“And?” Amina prompted.

“More often than not, the answer was no,” I said. “Too tired. Too much going on. Another task still unfinished in his head.”

I remembered watching Eesa’s face close over when his father said, “Maybe later, buddy,” without looking up from his phone. I remembered how affection, too, had its limits. How my husband would joke that I held his hand too tightly in public, as if handholding felt conspicuous, unnecessary. We loved each other, of course, but love lived efficiently then, tucked between obligations like receipts filed in a drawer. I didn’t expect interruptions. I didn’t expect him to wander into my office and lean down to kiss the top of my head while I was absorbed in my work, because that kind of softness wasn’t part of the rhythm we had established over years of practical coexistence.

This is not a story about what he failed to do. I cannot fully know what he was carrying then. His workload was immense, the stress constant and compounding. When you are under that kind of pressure, the world narrows to a pinpoint of necessity. You move forward with blinders on, focused on holding everything together. Stress doesn’t just exhaust you. It quietly teaches you what to overlook, and sometimes who.

What illness did was interrupt those grooves with the force of a record scratch.

“Now, instead of tossing a football for ten distracted minutes, he goes to the gym with Eesa almost every day,” I said. I see them leave together in the morning, my husband’s hand resting on our son’s shoulder as they head out the door. It’s not performative or forced. It’s become theirs, a space they’ve built together out of repetition and shared effort and presence. They lift weights. They talk, or sometimes they don’t. They just exist side by side in a way that feels deeper than anything I’d seen before, maybe deeper than what was possible before their bond was tested by the possibility of its ending.

And the affection I didn’t expect has arrived anyway, unannounced, naturalizing itself into our days. A hand reaching for mine without calculation. A casual touch as he passes by my desk. Last week, he came into my office while I was on a deadline, said nothing, kissed the top of my head, and left. As if to say that he sees me in this moment too. As if to say that I am not background.

The birthdays now feel natural, woven into the fabric of who we are rather than stitched on awkwardly. The anniversaries land with weight because we understand, finally, that time is not infinite, that we cannot assume there will always be another year to get it right.

Around the table, people nodded. I could see it in their faces, a kind of wonderment mixed with understanding, as if they were witnessing something they recognized but hadn’t quite known how to name.

“There was no grand reckoning,” I continued. “No speech about priorities.” Just a gradual shift in where his attention rests, a slow learning that celebration is not frivolity but witness. A way of saying that this day will not pass unmarked, that this person will not go unseen, that this moment, right here, matters.

What it feels like, from inside the family, is a change in casting. We are no longer background figures orbiting a demanding professional life, no longer the supporting infrastructure that makes everything else possible. We are the main scene, the story he is choosing to live inside.

Someone refilled my water glass. Across the table, candles flickered in their holders, small fires marking this evening as different from all the others that came before.

Caregiving has taught me that this is how lives change. It teaches you that to mark time is to honor it, and to honor time is to say that we were alive here, together, and we saw it. We did not let it slip past unmarked. We did not take it for granted.

At that birthday table, surrounded by friends who have watched this year from a distance, I realized that illness has not only exposed fragility, but clarified center. It has redrawn the floor plan of our life, pulling certain rooms forward and closing off others we once mistook for essential.

Care does that. It rearranges the architecture. It reveals where life is really being lived.

Leave a comment

I keep telling myself to write a new piece. I’ve been telling myself that since August.

The idea sits open on my laptop like an unfinished room, sentences framed but never drywalled, waiting for a quiet that never comes. Each week I promise myself the next flight, the next stolen evening, the next pocket of calm, and each week something more urgent arrives. Care does not knock. It simply walks in and sits down.

I thought I was waiting to write about my life. I didn’t realize the waiting was my life.

This fall, everything turned over at once: a new school, a new state, a new city whose streets I navigate by instinct rather than map. A new classroom of students who read me before I speak, deciding what kind of authority I am, what kind of care I will offer, what kind I will withhold. Teaching constitutional law for the first time meant waking early to revise lectures, doctrine running alongside domestic life, hypotheticals replaying themselves while I brushed my teeth and packed lunches and searched for missing shoes. Even as I moved through ordinary rituals, the law followed me, faint but insistent, asking to be shaped, explained, made legible to others.

I learned the cadence quickly: Sunday afternoon flights, the practiced efficiency of Clear and TSA Pre, the short hop to Lansing that became oddly intimate, the ride share smelling faintly of someone else’s coffee. By Wednesday night I was home again, bags in the mudroom, already scanning for what needed doing first.

“You’re back,” one of the kids would say—confirmation, not greeting.

“Yes,” I’d answer, dropping my purse, shrugging off my coat. “I’m back.”

Being home meant immediate recalibration. Making up for three nights gone, sitting longer at dinner, lingering in doorways, listening for what hadn’t been said in my absence. I’d rinse the mugs accumulated in the sink, start the dishwasher someone had loaded, turn off lights left glowing down the hall. Care is not only presence; it is the deliberate mending of what frays when you leave.

I told myself I would write when things slowed down. When I had perspective, when I could see the shape of what I was living clearly enough to name it. But you cannot witness your own life from inside the current. You can only move through it, mistaking motion for control.

One evening, my youngest said he wanted to ring in the new year early.

“Why?” I asked, half-smiling, bracing for something theatrical.

“Because 2025 was terrible,” he said, plainly. “It was the year Daddy was sick. And you were always traveling. It was just … a lot.”

A beat.

“It was a year of sudden stuff,” he added, reaching for language. “Like everything changed at once.”

I didn’t correct him or soften it. I nodded, because he was right. Children arrive at truth while we’re still managing logistics, still persuading ourselves that we’re fine. He had been taking inventory while I was busy keeping things moving. He saw what I was too close to see: that the year had asked too much, that the pace had cost something, that someone needed to say it out loud.

He became the witness I couldn’t be.

Now it’s the last day of the year. I’m home from our first family vacation in over a year, but I’m feverish, time slipping sideways, my body insisting on rest while my calendar refuses. The vacation already feels like a rumor. I unzip my suitcase on the bed and stop. Fold a shirt. Move it. Fold it again. My phone lights up on the dresser with another alert, another departure with a name attached to it.

I lean my weight against the dresser and say, quietly, “I’m tired.”

In two days, I’ll leave again—this time for Hawaii, with a spiritual development grant meant to restore my soul so that I can continue the work I do on religious pluralism, on listening across difference, on holding space for faith in a fractured public life. Even restoration, I’m learning, has a schedule. Even renewal must be justified.

I open my laptop, then close it. The document waits exactly where I left it, the cursor blinking with the steady patience of something that expects nothing from me.

What I want is a pause. Not escape or retreat, but a moment wide enough to see what I’ve been living inside. To recognize that this delayed piece is not an accident but evidence. That the architecture I’ve been inhabiting is built on vigilance and responsiveness and the quiet assumption that someone else’s needs must always come first.

I had been thinking of writing as something separate from caregiving, a refuge from it, a way to process experience from a distance. But maybe that was wrong. Maybe writing isn’t escape at all. Maybe it’s a kind of witnessing that requires stillness before it offers meaning.

In the morning, I slide a notebook into the side pocket of the suitcase without deciding whether I’ll use it. It’s an old habit, this gesture—packing the possibility of thought alongside the certainty of obligation. The notebook has followed me to dozens of places, its pages mostly blank, a quiet promise I keep making to myself even when I know I won’t have time to keep it.

Care, I’m learning, is not only what we give. It is the structure that determines what we’re allowed to postpone. Writing fell to the bottom not because it mattered least, but because everything else declared itself essential first. The piece I couldn’t write became the piece I was living.

This piece has been waiting because I have been holding everything else up.

And maybe that, too, is what needed to be said. That the cost of care is not only exhaustion, but the loss of the distance required to see yourself clearly. That sometimes your child has to tell you what you’ve been living through because you’ve been too busy living it to notice.

The postponement was never a failure.

It was the evidence.

Subscribe now

Friday afternoon, 1:10 p.m. The oncology ward smells of disinfectant and flowers left too long in water. Shabbir’s hand curls around the brass bell and for a moment, neither of us moves. The metal is warm from the sun slanting through tall windows, warm from all the hope it has carried.

For months, Shabbir sat in his small infusion room, tethered to IV lines, listening as the bell rang out in the hallway. Through the thin walls, he could hear the cheers of families, the muffled sobs that always accompanied release. He imagined their faces, studied their voices the way an anthropologist studies artifacts, searching for clues to what finishing might feel like.

Now it is our turn, and the moment feels both enormous and anticlimactic, like reaching a summit only to find the view hidden in clouds.

He pulls the rope. The sound cuts through the ward, and the nurses—so often focused on vitals glowing on iPads and computers—pause to clap and cheer. Their applause rises above the steady hum of machines keeping others alive. Sharp and final, the bell declares what we can hardly believe: we are no longer patients.

“That’s it,” the nurse says, her smile genuine but practiced. “You’re done.”

Done. The word rattles in my head like a marble in an empty jar. After months of living appointment to appointment, pill to pill, number to number, the absence of “next time” feels disorienting. Like finishing a book you never wanted to read but couldn’t put down, only to discover you’ve forgotten how to live without its gravity.

We gather the detritus of survival: color-coded pill organizers, the thermometer that became an extension of my hand. The car fills with leftover supplies and discharge papers, the archaeology of crisis. We point toward New Jersey, toward Shabbir’s sister’s house, toward normal people doing normal things.

An hour into the drive, drizzle swells into downpour, the kind that turns windshields into waterfalls. But we keep going, because we are done waiting. Then the sun breaks through. A rainbow stretches across the entire sky, vivid as if painted with liquid light. It arcs from the industrial landscape behind us to the New Jersey suburbs ahead, toward graduation parties and family chaos. We drive straight into it, as if we might pass through and emerge transformed.

“Well,” Shabbir says. That’s all, but I hear everything in it—relief, recognition, gratitude. The universe has offered a metaphor too precise to ignore. Sometimes the ordinary physics of water and light conspire to create a bridge just when you need one.

What Nobody Tells You About Finishing

The glossy survivor pamphlets don’t say this: the end doesn’t feel like an end. It feels like a waiting room between who you were and who you are becoming. Not sick anymore, but not quite well either. No ritual exists for the transition back from patient to person. You leave with discharge papers thick as a novella and a pharmacy’s worth of rattling bottles. You’re told to “take it easy,” as if easy were a place you could simply decide to visit.

A few days ago, they removed Shabbir’s central line. For months, it was his lifeline, the portal through which medicine kept him alive. Now it’s gone, replaced by a small scar. He takes multiple showers a day, reveling in the freedom of water without plastic wrap. But the instructions are clear: recovery takes a year. His new immune system—Zaynab’s generous gift, a biological love letter—must learn to recognize self from other, to settle in and defend.

Before is gone. The man who once planned summers around conferences now knows the taste of neutropenia, the meaning of engraftment. He has watched his daughter save his life with casual heroism. Crisis forced clarity: survive today. Tomorrow could wait. But “done” is messier. It means rebuilding around fragility, managing a dozen medications with contradictory warnings, relearning the difference between recovery and remission.

And it means facing others’ expectations. Friends and relatives expect relief, gratitude, readiness to return to normal. Some days we do feel those things. But we have been speaking another language for too long; ordinary conversation now feels foreign.

“How was your summer?” The question hovers, impossible to answer without either lying or saying too much.

The Arithmetic of Ordinary Days

Last weekend, I escaped—for the first time all summer. In Las Vegas, improbable city of light, the Backstreet Boys sang inside the Sphere. Stars exploded across its curved ceiling in impossible constellations, and for ninety minutes I was transported, vibrating with joy in a crowd of fifteen thousand. A version of myself I thought I’d lost resurfaced, singing along, untouched by medical vocabulary.

In Vegas, wonder felt like something borrowed, brief and personal. A week later, it arrived again, this time stretched across the sky, large enough to hold all of us. The rainbow lasted three minutes before dissolving back into gray. But in those minutes, it felt like a handoff, from the family who survived crisis to the family who must now learn to navigate its absence.

Zaynab, two months past her stem cell donation, is packing for college, arguing about dorm room décor and orientation events. Her story carries on. Eesa surprised us with quiet competence, emptying trash, tidying apartments, knowing when to vanish and when to be present. Now he returns to video games and sleepovers, though with a protective awareness in his gaze. Our children are experts now in the fragility of parents. And Mikael, the youngest, keeps asking when Daddy will be “all the way better.” It is a fair question without a simple answer.

The Strange Physics of Moving Forward

The drive to New Jersey should have felt like triumph, but instead it felt like the ache after holding your breath too long. For months, time was measured in precise medical units—fractions of blood counts, hours between pills, survival percentages. Now time has to be relearned in civilian form: vacations, bedtime, silence without vigilance. It is like learning to walk in a world where gravity has shifted.

The rainbow reminded us: bridges don’t carry you; you must walk them, step-by-step, trusting the unseen foundations.

After the Threshold

Saturday morning, Shabbir’s sister’s house buzzes with celebration. One nephew graduating high school, another heading to med school. Beginnings everywhere: graduation caps and discharge papers, congratulations cards and new plans. Relatives who asked, “How is he?” now ask, “What’s next?” The question feels lighter, carrying possibility instead of dread.

Children race through the yard, oblivious to yesterday’s milestone. The world spun on while we survived. Now we rejoin it, not as spectators but as participants. Rejoining isn’t the same as returning, because something has shifted, some recalibration of what matters.

Tonight, we drive home. The house will smell familiar but feel altered, because we are altered. We survived something we thought might break us.

Now what?

Subscribe now

“Anything you say or do can be used in my Substack.”

It started as a joke, something to deflate the tension of my phone appearing mid-conversation, of me scanning the room for sentences before anyone else had finished theirs. My kids said it to tease me. They still do. It has become our shorthand for what they already know: I am always half somewhere else, half inside the sentence I’m writing about them.

At first, I believed I was writing about my life. Now I’m not so sure. Now it feels like I am living my life in order to write about it.

Everything becomes potential material. Your daughter donates bone marrow, and you write an essay about divine order and cellular transformation. Your teenager screams in all caps over text, and you frame it as “The Wild Currents We Navigate.” Your husband’s illness becomes a newsletter called The Architecture of Care. Crisis as content, grief as genre.

I thought I was chronicling life. Maybe I was composing a version of it instead.

When I wrote about Zaynab’s graduation and bone marrow donation, eight days apart, I shaped it as a meditation on time, on what it means to come of age while simultaneously stepping into the hardest kind of adulthood. What I didn’t say—what I couldn’t say—was that it felt mostly like logistics. Phone calls and forms and everyone else waiting for me to coordinate schedules while they focused on meaning.

The meaning, I discovered, was mine to manufacture.

Some things don’t translate. Some truths resist curation. Family moments have jagged edges that tear through any container you try to build for them. Yet the digital attention economy whispers otherwise. Nothing has value, it insists, unless it can be shared, liked, commented upon. So, you learn to sand down the edges, to transform chaos into growth, to sculpt even private breakdowns into the kind of vulnerability that performs well online.

And readers respond. They praise “authenticity.” They say they feel seen. They tell you the story mattered. It does. But you know what they’re seeing is already shaped. The real argument, the real tears, cut in the edit room. The rawness exchanged for coherence.

I catch myself now in the act. Watching my daughter’s face crumple in disappointment while already composing the metaphor for teenage heartbreak. Feeling my husband’s hand, heavy in mine during a doctor’s visit, while cataloging its literary possibilities. I don’t know when I became this person, the one who experiences moments as quotable quotes.

Didion once wrote about keeping notebooks to remember “what it was to be me.” I wonder if I am writing to remember what it was to be us. Or if I am writing instead to create an “us” for public consumption.

I tell myself most of life still escapes the lens: the silent mornings, the jokes we never explain, the fights that reveal nothing profound. But I know the truth: the writer’s eye never fully closes. Some part of me is always standing slightly outside our life, taking notes.

And yet I can’t dismiss what this work does. The essay I wrote about caregiving—how invisible labor gnaws at your sense of self—drew dozens of messages from women who said they felt less alone. I gave language to what they had been carrying silently. That felt like purpose.

But I also made our suffering beautiful. I turned our chaos into art: water becoming steam, the weight of caregiving evaporating into something you could hold and admire. That is the trick, isn’t it? To make life feel meaningful rather than simply, relentlessly hard.

Maybe acknowledging this curation is itself a form of honesty. Maybe it’s the only kind available to those of us who turn private life into narrative. But even this confession becomes content, this critique becomes brand. The attempt to step outside the system becomes part of the system.

Perhaps the work is not to escape the contradiction, but to name it clearly. To honor both the service and the cost of making private life public.

After all, anything you say or do can be used in my Substack—including this confession about using everything in my Substack.

Subscribe now

Some days I miss her, and she’s still in the room—a phantom ache that settles in my chest like grief for someone who hasn’t left yet, who may never leave, but who feels impossibly distant even as she breathes the same recycled apartment air.

Zaynab, my eighteen-year-old daughter, carries contradictions in her newly adult body the way I carry mine in my forty-something one. She’s the girl who offered her bone marrow to save her father’s life without hesitation, who can make our temporary Baltimore apartment feel briefly like home with her easy laughter echoing off unfamiliar walls. She’s also the one who can trigger in me a rage so immediate and molten it surprises us both—a fury that rises from some primal place where love and frustration tangle until I can’t tell where protection ends and exasperation begins.

The contradiction lives in my body now, a constant tension between the mother who wants to hold her close and the one who sometimes wants to shake her until she understands that while this isn’t forever, right now we need all hands on deck.

We’ve spent these months in Baltimore for Shabbir’s cancer treatment—a finite sentence with a good prognosis, treatment that will wrap up by the end of summer and return us to our real lives. But temporary doesn’t mean easy. Our lives are compressed into a two-bedroom apartment that smells faintly of disinfectant and someone else’s cooking, where my eight-year-old heads to camp each morning with the resilience that only small children possess, where my thirteen-year-old has become my unexpected ally—throwing out vomit bags without flinching, keeping the apartment tidy, offering his broadening shoulders as support when his dad walks from car to door, joking easily in a way that makes Shabbir’s eyes crinkle with something that isn’t pain.

But Zaynab exists in her own orbit, helping here and there when asked but mostly floating through our crisis like a visitor passing through someone else’s emergency. Most weekends, she escapes back to Potomac where her real life waits—graduation parties where she can be eighteen and unencumbered, sleepovers where she can forget the sound of retching through thin walls, concerts where the music drowns out the medical terminology that has become our temporary vocabulary. This week she’s asking for even more days away, and I can feel her need like a physical pull, the way a plant turns toward light.

We’ve said yes again and again, not because we aren’t stretched thin as wire, but because we want her to live—to be eighteen and free and focused on herself in the way eighteen-year-olds are supposed to be, to not have to carry the weight of our temporary upheaval on shoulders that should only know the burden of college applications and summer plans.

And yet. Yesterday, she asked for more.

The ask came while I was juggling the complex mathematics of short-term crisis: blending soft foods Shabbir could stomach in his treatment-ravaged state, coordinating my thirteen-year-old’s helpful energy with my eight-year-old’s camp schedule, managing the logistics of a life temporarily displaced while scrambling to meet a deadline because bills don’t pause for chemotherapy. The words tumbled out before I could catch them, sharp-edged and unforgiving.

“Now is not the time to be self-centered,” I said, and watched that word—self-centered—hit her like a physical blow.

She spun from the kitchen, sneakers squeaking against vinyl in a sound that will haunt me, voice cracking with a fury that seemed to come from her toes. The apartment felt too small to contain us both, the air too thick to breathe. We both cried—loud, messy tears that bounced off unfamiliar walls and settled into the cracks between us like salt in a wound. Then we retreated to opposite ends of the space, trying to breathe through what felt like drowning on dry land, each of us gasping for something the other couldn’t give.

She’s trying to make sense of a disruption that feels enormous even though we all know it’s temporary, where every choice ripples outward to touch her father’s treatments, my sanity, her siblings’ carefully maintained normalcy. I’m holding our family together through this finite but intense period with caffeine and the kind of desperate love that sometimes looks like anger because it has nowhere else to go.

When illness temporarily enters a household, everything sharpens to a point that cuts. Eighteen-year-olds who should be thinking about college and independence are instead confronted with their parents’ mortality, their family’s fragility. They swing between wanting to help and needing to escape, between guilt over their normalcy and resentment at being needed, between the child who still wants to be taken care of and the adult who sees too clearly what’s being asked of them.

This morning, the switch flipped again. After a day of slammed doors and silence thick enough to choke on, she called out to me as “Mommy” and asked for Nutella on croissant bread, her voice soft and small like it used to be when she was six and the world’s biggest problem was whether her sandwich was cut into triangles or squares.

No apologies. Just a return, tentative and hopeful as dawn.

That night, once the apartment had settled into uneasy quiet punctuated only by Shabbir’s treatment-disrupted sleep, I scrolled the news with the desperate hunger of someone looking for distraction from their own temporarily upended life. That’s when I saw the story that wouldn’t let me go: the Camp Mystic flood in Texas.

Eighteen-year-old girls, trapped by rising waters, screaming as they clung to trees while rescue swimmers pulled 165 people to safety. But what pierced me wasn’t the water—it was imagining the parents getting that call. Your daughter is at camp, that sacred space of sunscreen and friendship bracelets, and suddenly you’re hearing words like “flash flood” and “helicopter rescue” and “we’re doing everything we can.”

One minute, you’re worried about sunscreen. The next, you’re praying she remembers how to swim.

The metaphor crystallized with brutal clarity: this is what we’re doing, too. Every day during this temporary crisis. Rescuing. Reaching. Holding on through rising waters that threaten to sweep us all away, even though we know the flood will recede.

In crisis, even temporary ones, we form human chains, holding each other even when we’re angry, refusing to let go even when holding on hurts. And sometimes, the ones we’re trying to save are the ones thrashing against our grip—not because they don’t love us, but because even short-term drowning makes you desperate, makes you fight the very hands trying to pull you to shore.

Some days, the rage sits just beneath my surface like a living thing, sharp and metallic, when she floats through our temporary chaos seemingly untouched while her younger brother empties vomit bags without complaint. The fury of loving someone so much while feeling invisible to them, the exhaustion of being both lifeline and ignored, the impossible weight of being needed by everyone except the one who should care most.

But then she says “Mommy” and asks for Nutella, and I remember: this is the return. Not the calm after the storm, but the tether—the love that keeps pulling us back to shore, even while we’re both still gasping for air, even while the temporary flood keeps rising around us.

Subscribe now

We talk about the loneliness epidemic like it’s abstract. But it’s not.

There is a map of loneliness that no cartographer has ever drawn, though we navigate it daily. You can see it in hospital rooms that echo too loud. In bedsides with no visitors. In nurses who linger longer than necessary because no one else has shown up all week.

This is a map of invisibility—territories where suffering goes unseen, where people carry burdens that never make it into our conversations or our care. But it’s also a map of connection, where small acts of witness can redraw entire landscapes of isolation. The difference between these territories isn’t geography. It’s design.

I learned to read this map the hard way, during the months when my husband Shabbir was first hospitalized for cancer treatment. What I discovered was that we all live somewhere on this map, but most of us don’t know our coordinates until crisis forces us to look up from our daily routines and notice: Where am I? Who else is here? And who is missing entirely?

The Territory of Being Witnessed

The first week of Shabbir’s hospitalization, our front porch became something else entirely—an altar of attention where friends redrew the boundaries of our isolation. I had always thought of our porch as simply functional, a place to stack Amazon packages and shake out rugs. But suddenly it became a landmark on the map of care, a coordinates where love could find us.

Each gift that arrived felt like a pin dropped on this new geography of connection. Cake pops for Mikael arrived tucked in a box with star-shaped sprinkles—someone had remembered that seven-year-olds still believe in magic, even when their fathers are sick. A basket filled with dates for iftar, a candle scented with olive leaf and oud, and a child-size prayer rug—soft, jet black, with gold tassels. The person who left it understood something about the terrain we were crossing: that sometimes you need to create sacred space in the most sterile places.

What followed felt like its own form of navigation, breadcrumbs leading us back to connection when we might have otherwise gotten lost in the wilderness of medical terminology and insurance forms. Sarah’s sourdough arrived in professional bakery bags, though she’d baked every loaf herself—walnut cranberry one week, jalapeño cheddar the next—each delivery still warm and fragrant with the particular comfort of someone else’s kitchen. Amina’s homemade butter and jam, evidence that someone had been thinking of us while churning and stirring. Sophia’s cardamom tea, steeped in the silence of someone who understood that sometimes the best thing you can offer is flavor when everything else tastes like fear.

None of it was grand, but all of it was attentive. Not the kind of help you Google (“What do you bring someone with cancer?”) but the kind that comes from having been there, from understanding the small indignities and unexpected needs that crater the landscape of illness. The kind that reorients us toward each other when the gravitational pull of isolation threatens to scatter us into separate orbits.

This quiet web of care reminded me how rare it is to be truly held. And how easy it is to miss who isn’t.

Subscribe now

The Territory of Abandonment

Down the hall from Shabbir lived another geography entirely, a place where the map showed only empty space, unmarked by human presence. If care leaves traces like breadcrumbs, abandonment leaves something else: the echo of footsteps that never came, the outline of visits that never happened.

A woman in the room next to his could be heard wailing at random intervals throughout the day—calling, pleading with the empty air. Her voice would rise and fall like a tide, sometimes forming words, sometimes dissolving into something more primal. Her door remained half closed, the hallway outside perpetually empty, as if her grief had created its own force field that repelled visitors.

No get-well cards littered her windowsill. No personal items cluttered her bedside table—no photos propped against the water pitcher, no books spine-cracked from being read by someone who cared enough to choose them. Just the standard-issue hospital blanket, pulled tight to her chin, and a water pitcher that the nurses refilled because no one else was there to notice it was empty.

I found myself timing my walks around her cries, unable to bear the sound but also unable to stop listening. There was something about the regularity of her solitude that felt systematic, predictable, as if loneliness had its own inexorable rhythm..

Not a single visitor came in and out of her room the whole month Shabbir was first hospitalized. When he went back in for his second round of chemo three weeks later, she was still there, still wailing, still alone. Her room had become an island in the truest sense: surrounded on all sides by an ocean too wide to cross.

Another evening, I heard a man shouting in terror, dragging his IV pole as he stumbled down the hallway. “Someone get me out of here!” he cried, his voice cracking against the fluorescent lights. The words echoed against the linoleum floors, bouncing off walls that had heard it all before. His terror was specific—not just fear of illness, but fear of facing it alone, of disappearing into the kind of medical anonymity where your name becomes a room number and your pain becomes a chart notation.

Later, a nurse told me he’d been there six days with no visitors. “Some people just go through this alone,” she said, not unkindly, just plainly, as if it were weather. As if abandonment were a natural phenomenon rather than a choice, a series of small decisions that accumulate into vast territories of isolation.

But it’s not weather. It’s design.

The Architecture of Isolation

What creates these territories of abandonment? It’s not accidental geography. It’s the deliberate architecture of a culture that has organized itself around individual competence rather than collective care, around the myth that needing help is weakness rather than the most human thing we do.

We’ve built healthcare systems that prioritize efficiency over connection, where “patient throughput” matters more than whether someone dies alone, where visiting hours are designed around staff schedules rather than human need.

We’ve created economic structures that scatter families across time zones like seeds in the wind, then wonder why grandparents languish in facilities with no visitors, why adult children feel guilty for living too far away to help, why the geography of economic opportunity rarely overlaps with the geography of care. The American Dream promised mobility, but it delivered isolation—the freedom to go anywhere coupled with the loneliness of having no one to call when you need help.

We’ve designed neighborhoods where you can live next to someone for decades without learning their name, where privacy is valued more than connection, where the architecture of suburban life—high fences, attached garages, closed blinds—creates physical barriers that mirror emotional ones. I realized this in a former home, when I tried to think of which neighbors I could call in an emergency and, after eleven years in the same house, came up with almost no one.

Our digital culture compounds this isolation, mistaking information for intimacy and performance for presence. We scroll through curated lives while collapsing quietly off-screen, each of us believing we’re the only one struggling because everyone else’s highlight reel looks so polished. We’ve built a world where you can have 500 friends on Facebook and still die alone in a hospital room, where connection feels abundant and available but presence feels rare and precious.

This isn’t just about individual choices—though those matter. It’s about systems that make care optional rather than integral, that treat presence as a luxury rather than a necessity, that mistake privacy for dignity and independence for worth. We’ve created a culture where asking for help feels like failure, where admitting you need support feels like weakness, where the people who are drowning learn to do it quietly so as not to bother anyone.

The map of care isn’t just about who shows up. It’s about who feels permitted to show up, who has the time and resources to show up, who knows how to navigate the terrain of another person’s suffering without making it about themselves. It’s about the invisible boundaries that keep people from reaching across the space between self and other, the unspoken rules that govern when care is appropriate and when it’s intrusive.

The Weight of the Invisible

When I published The Weight You Can’t See, I expected a few kind replies from people who knew us, maybe some hearts on social media, the usual gentle acknowledgments that pass for support in our digitally mediated world. Instead, I was flooded with messages—evidence that people had been waiting years, sometimes decades, for someone to name what they were carrying.

The response felt like a dam breaking, like I had accidentally given people permission to speak about territories of experience that had been unmapped in our usual conversations. That phrase, “feel seen,” appeared in message after message, as if visibility itself had become a rare commodity. Women wrote about caring for in-laws, navigating a husband’s brain surgery, managing the isolation of caregiving that made them question their own reality. Each described the same topology of fear and endurance—the sleepless nights, the way children grow up too fast when crisis visits, the peculiar strength that emerges when you have no choice but to keep going.

But one response stopped me cold. A mother of a child with autism wrote about “stepping back into nearly 10 years of writing our autism family truths,” how my words had helped her recognize patterns she’d been living but not naming: “the threads of being everyone’s caregiver, wanting time for yourself and feeling guilty about it, seeing our kids step up in unexpected ways—all so familiar. The unbearable lightness of the weight we learn to carry. The ease creeps up in ways in which we never expected such that when we recognize it, it feels alien.”

That phrase—“the unbearable lightness of the weight we learn to carry”—captured something I was still learning to understand: how you adapt to carrying what feels impossible until it becomes so much a part of you that you forget you’re carrying it at all. How the weight becomes invisible even to yourself, until someone names it and suddenly you remember: oh yes, I have been carrying this enormous thing.

What struck me wasn’t just that they related—it was that they were waiting for someone to name it. The isolation isn’t just about being alone. It’s about carrying experiences that have no language, no social scripts, no cultural recognition. These are the unmapped territories of our social landscape, places where people navigate profound experiences entirely alone, not because they lack relationships, but because those relationships lack the vocabulary or permission to enter difficult spaces.

The Territory of Sacred Obligation

But there are other territories on this map, places where care isn’t left to chance or good intentions. In some communities, presence isn’t optional—it’s woven into the fabric of social expectation, as fundamental as showing up for work or feeding your children.

I learned this from the Islamic teaching that says when you visit the sick, you are surrounded by mercy, that to walk toward someone in need is to walk a path through paradise. Whether or not you believe that literally, the framing matters: care is not extra. It’s expected. It’s sacred. Not because it fixes anything, but because it refuses to let suffering happen unseen.

This represents a fundamentally different map, one where care is infrastructure rather than charity, where showing up becomes as automatic as responding to a smoke alarm because we understand that abandonment, like fire, spreads quickly through the structures we’ve built. In these territories, the question isn’t “Should I visit?” but “When will I visit?” The pathways are already drawn.

But even within communities that value care, the geography can be uneven. Some people live at the center of networks of attention, while others exist at the periphery, their suffering noted but not necessarily witnessed. The difference often comes down to factors that have nothing to do with need: social capital, family structure, personality, the simple luck of being well-connected when crisis hits.

Learning to Navigate

The strange thing about the geography of care is that you can live in it for years without knowing how to read it. Before Shabbir’s diagnosis, I lived in the comfortable territory of the temporarily unafflicted—that vast middle ground where you assume crisis happens to other people, where you offer help when asked, check in when convenient. I thought I understood community care because I participated in it occasionally, the way someone might think they understand a foreign country because they’ve stayed in its hotels.

But witnessing both profound connection and profound abandonment in the same hallway, sometimes in the same day, changed something fundamental about how I navigate the world. I started to see the invisible infrastructure of care—who has it, who doesn’t, and why. I began to recognize the landmarks of different territories: the way someone’s voice changes when they’re carrying something heavy, the particular quality of silence that surrounds unwitnessed suffering, the small gestures that signal whether someone is part of a network of care or adrift in the vast ocean of managing alone.

Even more importantly, I learned to see the borders between territories, the invisible lines that separate those who are held from those who are forgotten. These borders aren’t always about geography or economics or social class, though those factors matter. Sometimes they’re about something more subtle: the difference between communities that see care as occasional charity and communities that see it as continuous obligation, between cultures that value independence above all else and cultures that understand interdependence as fundamental to human flourishing.

The map of loneliness is real, drawn in the space between those who are witnessed and those who disappear, and once you learn to read it, you can never stop seeing it.

Leave a comment

Let me start here: this one’s going to read a little differently.

It’s not polished. It’s not tidy. It’s not one of those luminous caregiver essays where the suffering makes sense in the end. This is messier. It’s about the parts we don’t talk about—when the work is invisible, but the cost is not.

February 15th. Two weeks before Ramadan. The oncologist’s words hung in the fluorescent air: acute myeloid leukemia. Shabbir grew quiet, started fidgeting in his chair, his voice turning gruff when the doctor asked if we had questions. That’s the moment the clock started—not just the medical timeline, but a subtler one: the countdown to my own collapse. I didn’t see it then. I just moved into management mode, into the role I’ve trained for my whole adult life without realizing it.

Then Ramadan came. And with it, a schedule already tilted toward intensity: fasting from dawn to dusk, late nights of prayer, early mornings of suhoor. But this time, layered over that sacred rhythm was a new, insistent tempo: hospital runs, oncology appointments, managing side effects, translating medical language, holding Shabbir’s fears, holding my own at bay.

By day, I fasted and parented. By night, I prayed and shuttled. I poured myself out in both places, hoping the sum total of my care would be enough to sustain everyone.

It wasn’t.

Friends and family reached out. They texted, called, asked how I was doing. I answered quickly—always politely, always concisely. “I’m fine.” “We’re managing.” “Thanks for asking.” It was easier to move past the moment than to enter it. I didn’t have the emotional reserves to translate what I was carrying to people who had never borne a parallel weight. I wasn’t a lesson. I wasn’t a story someone else needed to learn from.

Except once.

A woman I’d only spoken to a handful of times—an acquaintance from past gatherings, warm and grounded, someone I knew had once walked through fire caring for her gravely ill son—texted to ask how I was doing.

And without preamble, I typed back: “Baltimore feels like a prison.”

Something about finally naming it cracked something open in me.

Ambition, Interrupted (But Not Silenced)

There’s a verse in the Qur’an that speaks of those who give of themselves seeking only the face of God. It’s a high ideal, a sacred posture: to serve without expectation, to labor in secret, to exhaust yourself for others and call it worship.

For many women, that’s not a metaphor, it’s a mirror. It’s how we live. We are trained to disappear gracefully into usefulness. To believe that to be needed is the highest form of being.

I wrote once, half in jest, about Ambition, Interrupted—about what it feels like to keep trying to work, to write, to think in full sentences while juggling the logistics of a life suddenly fractured. I used humor to soften it, but what I felt wasn’t funny. It was fear. A low, steady panic that I was vanishing. That the parts of me I had built—the thinker, the writer, the woman with outlines and deadlines and sentences sharp enough to survive—were dissolving under the weight of being everyone’s anchor.

Shabbir needed me, not occasionally or in passing, but with a kind of emotional intensity that eclipsed everything else. He wanted to talk about life and death, about meaning and memory, about what we had built and what we might still become. What he craved wasn’t distraction, but undivided presence. And I wanted to give it to him. I believed, with all my heart, that love, in its truest form, is not just a feeling but a kind of radical availability.

But I also wanted to finish the paper I’d started. To feel the cool clarity of being alone with my thoughts. To not be needed, just for an hour.

And that made me feel selfish in ways I still don’t know how to name.

Sometimes I wonder if I’ll ever again feel whole in a room by myself.

Transplant Week: The Splitting Point

When the transplant came, I broke into three.

Zaynab was the donor. Shabbir, the recipient. I was the bridge, the buffer, the quiet mechanism holding the ends together.

In the days leading up to the procedure, Zaynab was almost casual about it. “I don’t know why people keep calling me brave,” she’d say with a shrug. “I’ll be asleep the whole time.”

On the morning of the harvest, she got dressed like it was any other Tuesday—pulling on her jeans, slipping her feet into her UGGs, already thinking about what she might eat for lunch afterward. I drove her to the hospital, watching her scroll through her phone.

But afterwards—afterwards was different.

She hurt more than she expected. The first thing she said when she woke up was, “The doctor lied to me. He said I would just be sore. But this is ... pain.” Real pain. Adult pain. The kind that doesn’t respond to ice cream or gentle words.

I watched my daughter’s face change over those next few days. Not just from the procedure, but from the shock of her own naivety. She couldn’t walk normally—had to waddle, favoring one side. She felt awkward in public, self-conscious about how she moved. Sleep became elusive, nights filled with shifting positions to find comfort that wouldn’t come. Her body was still processing whatever cocktail of anesthesia and pain medication was working its way through her system.

She had given a piece of herself without truly understanding what she was giving, and now she was learning that good intentions don’t soften the blade. That love costs exactly what it costs, no matter how willingly you pay.

Shabbir, too, was vulnerable in a way I had never seen. He was terrified, worn down, utterly raw. He looked at me as if I were the only solid thing left in the room.

And in the middle of it all, I had my thirteen-year-old son to think of—a boy full of video games and e-bikes and endless text threads. We joked that he had become a digital hologram, visible only when we powered down the router. So one day, we did. A forced, reluctant detox.

Something surprising happened. He stepped into the room. Not just physically, but emotionally.

He learned to flush Shabbir’s central line, pushing saline through the clear plastic tubing with careful hands. He helped administer medication. He made his father laugh—real laughs, not the polite ones we’d all been practicing. We started calling him The Nurse, half-teasing, half-astonished. It was like watching a boy stumble into manhood by accident, and then choose, quietly, to stay a while.

As his mother, I wanted to preserve his right to drift through this summer unburdened by adult fear. But I also needed him to feel the gravity of what was unfolding around him, to understand that this was not background noise, but something that required his presence not as a bystander, but as a witness. His father’s life could not be just another tab to close, another notification to swipe away.

There’s no manual for how to manage your children’s emotions while your husband is undergoing a transplant with your daughter’s marrow. No playbook for how to preserve their safety and still teach them reverence.

No one tells you that love will require this much choreography.

Work That Counts, and Work That Doesn’t

In the stillness before the transplant, I tried to work. Not out of discipline, but out of desperation. I wanted to leave a mark of myself before I disappeared again.

This is the myth we live inside: that our value lies in output, in visible achievement, in things we can quantify. Hustle culture is a kind of secular theology now. It whispers that your worth is whatever you’ve most recently produced.

Even sacred labor begins to feel like waste.

This week, the chemo triggered a new complication. Shabbir’s bladder lining stopped regenerating, and it began to shed. He was in agony, unable to sit still for more than twenty minutes before rushing to the bathroom. I was managing it in pieces: pain meds, water bottles, cleaning up after him, scanning for blood in places it shouldn’t be.

Then the phone rang.

I stepped into the hallway to take it. Amina and I hadn’t spoken in weeks. She asked how I was holding up. I gave her the outline—the medical details, the logistics, the exhaustion. I was talking fast, the way you do when you’re trying to get through the facts without falling into them.

Then, almost offhandedly, she said, “You know, when you give for God, it finds its way back to you. Maybe not here. Maybe later. Maybe in your career. Or through the kids.”

It wasn’t a pep talk. Just a plain sentence. But it landed like a message, like something I was meant to hear in that exact moment. A thread from one world to another. That maybe the parts of yourself you pour out now don’t disappear but transform, returning later in different clothes.

I went back inside and found Shabbir folded into the sheets, trembling slightly as each wave of pain passed through him. I stood there for a moment, watching him, and felt something shift—not the weight itself, but my relationship to carrying it.

Maybe Amina was right. Maybe the parts of myself I was pouring out weren’t disappearing but transforming, the way water becomes steam: invisible, but not gone.

Subscribe now

There is a word in Arabic—fitrah—that describes the natural order instilled in all creation, the divine pattern that runs deeper than what we can see or understand. It’s the reason birds migrate without maps, the reason wounds heal without instruction, the reason love persists through impossible circumstances.

I’ve been thinking about this as I watch my husband’s blood rebuild itself with cells that carry my genetic code, passed through our daughter’s bone marrow. What looks like medical crisis is in fact the body’s ancient knowledge of how to restore itself to wholeness.

The Banality of Miracles

“Who’s your favorite singer?” they asked as Zaynab settled onto the operating table Tuesday morning.

“Taylor Swift,” she replied, and just like that, Miss Americana & the Heartbreak Prince filled the OR as the anesthesia pulled her under.

The same song had opened the Eras Tour in Lisbon, a surprise we’d been planning for months and finally revealed on her birthday with a money cake. We told her to pull the ribbon, and as the bills kept coming—layer after layer—she finally reached the note: You. Are. Going. To. Eras Tour! Her jaw dropped. For a second, she just stared at us, stunned, then burst into tears and laughter at the same time.

In the stadium, she didn’t scream like the rest of the crowd. She just stood still, eyes locked on the stage, like she was being seen from somewhere deep inside. It was the kind of stillness that comes from awe—not absence, but total presence. You could see something open in her, something tender and enormous.

Now here she was, unconscious under fluorescent lights, her marrow being harvested to save her father’s life. The same song playing. The same girl, but not the same. Lisbon was joy: electric, weightless, teenage. This was sacrifice: quiet, clinical, sacred. And yet somehow, the two moments touched, connected by something deeper than coincidence.

When I found her in the recovery room, she looked impossibly young again—pale, her hair spread across the pillow, IV tubes looping around her arm like ribbons. I had to hold the doorframe to stay upright. People love to talk about medical miracles, but they never mention the part where you watch your child become a hero before she’s even had a chance to be a grown-up. They don’t mention how much stillness a miracle requires from the people witnessing it.

The Cellular Republic

Two floors up, Shabbir was being prepped to receive what the nurses kept calling “the heroic gift.” They were visibly moved, watching this father-daughter lifeline play out in real time. But here’s what struck me: bone marrow transplants don’t look like life-saving theater. There are no dramatic countdowns, no sterile choreography. The marrow gets hung like an IV drip. No fuss. Just a clear plastic bag and a quiet drip-drip-drip, like it’s nothing more than Tylenol in a hospital gown.

Eighteen years of Zaynab’s life—and half of mine—flowing through that plastic tube. A sacred legacy disguised as routine. This is how miracles arrive: looking nothing like they do in the movies. The divine announces itself not in orchestral swells, but in the steady rhythm of an IV pump, marking time in a language older than fear.

We joked as the marrow dripped in. “Maybe he’ll finally play Scattergories,” said a friend.

“Maybe he’ll start organizing his closet by color,” someone added.

“Maybe,” I muttered, “he’ll finally admit I’m right more often.”

We laughed, not because it was hilarious, but because the alternative was to sit in silence and let the magnitude crush us.

The scientists have words for all this—engraftment, chimerism, hematopoietic reconstitution—but those words don’t touch what this feels like. This isn’t just biology. It’s transformation at the level of essence. What’s happening inside Shabbir’s body is millions of microscopic architects rebuilding his immune system according to blueprints written in our shared DNA.

What does it mean when your identity literally circulates in someone else’s body? What happens when family becomes cellular, not metaphorical? We talk about kinship in terms of love and duty, but here we are—remade, molecularly. Our family has collapsed the boundary between self and other in ways I didn’t think possible.

Somewhere inside Shabbir, Zaynab’s cells are mapping unfamiliar terrain, stitching him back together.

The body knows what the mind cannot fathom.

The Choreography of Crisis

I’ve been managing Shabbir’s leukemia the way a handler manages a difficult celebrity—always one step ahead of the meltdown, coordinating appearances and minimizing public mess. I have Google calendar invites and Notes app lists and six different prayer groups across nine states. I’m fielding texts, relaying lab updates, managing visitors like a backstage rider. I am not calm, but I am operational.

This summer was supposed to look different. I had back-to-back conferences in Switzerland and Beijing. Switzerland! Where I would’ve sipped absurdly expensive cappuccinos on sun-drenched terraces and taken photos of mountains so painterly they’d make people question their life choices. Beijing was going to be my jet-lagged fever dream—complaining about the time difference while secretly delighting in late-night dumplings and neon alleys.

Instead, I’m writing this from a short-term rental in Baltimore, where the dryer doesn’t dry and the air conditioning gaslights us daily. Our suitcases remain half-open, like we’re undecided about whether we’re staying or fleeing.

We’ve been told to prepare for sixty days of semi-residency, an in-between existence that isn’t quite inpatient, isn’t quite outpatient. A liminal mode of living, rooted here in Baltimore but stretched thin across two cities. It feels like life paused somewhere between a hospital corridor and a corporate Airbnb, where everything looks clean until you touch it and nothing really belongs to you—not even your own calendar.

Most days, we orbit the hospital. But Potomac still pulls at us: school obligations, pediatric appointments, forgotten chargers, half-eaten cereal boxes waiting back home. I shuttle back and forth, juggling kids’ activities and chemo schedules, living out of two zip codes and too many Google Maps tabs. I’ve scheduled playdates from waiting rooms, answered work emails in parking garages, and coordinated dinner while pacing hospital corridors looking for better signal.

But chaos has its own grammar. The seemingly random interruptions—they’re not disruptions of the plan. They are the plan. Each detour teaches us something we didn’t know we needed to learn. Each delay creates space for a conversation that changes everything.

The madness has method, even when we can’t see it.

The Sacred Mathematics

In American Symphony, Jon Batiste and Suleika Jaouad show us what it means to live in emotional whiplash, one partner racking up Grammys, the other undergoing a bone marrow transplant. It’s not about transcendence tucked into everyday life. It’s about extremes colliding: triumph and terror coexisting in real time.

That split-screen reality feels familiar. Our version is less glamorous but just as disorienting. On one side: the near-sci-fi fact that my genetic code, passed through Zaynab, is rebuilding Shabbir’s immune system from scratch. On the other: a broken parking meter, a missed prescription pickup, a 13-year-old son who’s laser-focused on group chats and inside jokes, and an 8-year-old who doesn’t fully grasp the stakes but still manages to ask things like, “Will Daddy’s new blood remember us?”

You learn to live between those extremes. To hold awe and irritation in the same breath, to be split between wonder and burnout without needing to resolve the contradiction.

Now I watch Shabbir sleep, new blood circulating. The monitors pulse in rhythm, not as chaos, but as electronic dhikr, a kind of whispered litany in code.

And somewhere in that microscopic choreography, I catch a glimpse of fitrah: the sacred pattern beneath all this noise.

Subscribe now

I tell people that my daughter graduated from high school on June 9th and will donate bone marrow to her father on June 17th, and they get a certain look. It’s the look of someone who believes they’ve just witnessed a moment of profound symmetry—a cosmic circle closing, one they feel uniquely qualified to name.

“What a gift,” they say, or “Isn’t that just the most—” and they pause, searching for the word that will adequately contain what they perceive to be the specialness of it all. “Profound,” they settle on, finally. “Isn’t that just the most profound thing?”

I have learned to smile when they say this. Not because I disagree, exactly, but because their need to name it, to wrap it in the language of closure and meaning, tells me they have misunderstood something fundamental about how time actually works.

It is June 13th today. Four days since graduation. Four days until the procedure.

The weekend before graduation, Zaynab and I went to get our nails done. She chose a French manicure with a thin gold line traced under the white tips, a detail so subtle it was almost invisible unless you were looking for it.

“It’s perfect,” she said, holding her hand up to the light to examine the technician’s work.

“Nice,” I said.

“And it goes with everything.”

The nail salon was one of those places that exists in perpetual fluorescent afternoon, where time moves differently and every conversation takes place at exactly the same volume. We watched other people’s hands being transformed into small works of art, and I found myself thinking about the rituals that surround transitions, the ways we prepare our bodies for events that are supposed to change us.

The gold line was so thin it disappeared entirely from certain angles. You had to turn your hand just right to catch it in the light. A reminder, maybe, that what’s subtle is often what’s truest—especially in how we mark time.

What people don’t understand when they talk about full circles and life cycles is that time, real time, doesn’t move in circles. It moves in interruptions. It lurches and stops and doubles back on itself like a film reel that has come loose from its sprockets.

Consider: on June 17th, Zaynab will undergo a medical procedure. In three months, she will start college. These events exist in the same temporal space, separated only by the arbitrary divisions we use to organize experience. We have convinced ourselves that the proximity of graduation and what comes next carries some special weight, some narrative significance that elevates it above the ordinary chaos of all the other dates circled on our calendar.

The truth is simpler and more disturbing: every date carries this weight. We just don’t usually notice.

At dinner a few nights ago, while discussing the logistics of Tuesday’s procedure, the concept of Shabbir’s “new birthday” came up. The doctors had mentioned it during our last consultation—not in any ceremonial sense, but biologically. June 17th will be the day his blood begins to remake itself with Zaynab’s cells, the day his body learns to recognize her marrow as its own. A third birth, forty-seven years after the first two.

“So now I’ll have three birthdays?” he asked.

Shabbir already has two birthdays—his actual birth date in India, and the one his parents claimed for official paperwork when they immigrated. In our community, this is more common than not. Paper time rarely matches lived time. Bureaucracies ask for dates; families tell stories. One marks the moment someone stamped a form. The other marks when the sky looked a certain way, or when the jackfruit tree was still flowering, or when the monsoon came early that year.

We joke that if we forget one birthday, we can always use the other—but it’s the joke of people who’ve always known that calendars are just guesses wearing suits.

“Three options,” Zaynab said. “If we forget two, we still have a backup.”

At dinner last week, Zaynab made Shabbir an offer.

“I’ll do the bone marrow thing,” she said, passing the rice without looking up, “but you have to play Scattergories with me afterward.”

She was cutting her chicken with the focused precision she brings to tasks she finds mildly annoying, which includes most dinnertime conversations that threaten to become Serious.

“I hate Scattergories,” Shabbir said.

“I know. That’s why it’s a good trade.”

“How is that a good trade for me?”

“Because you get my bone marrow,” she said, still not looking up from her plate.

Shabbir was quiet for a moment. Then he said, “I’m still not playing Scattergories.”

“Fine,” Zaynab said. “But I’m still doing the thing.”

“Good,” he said.

“Good,” she said.

This is how our family negotiates meaning: through banter that disguises the weight of what we cannot bring ourselves to say directly. The procedure was never conditional on boardgames. But the offer itself was a way of making the abstract concrete, of turning medical necessity into family mythology. This is how a story becomes myth: not through exaggeration, but through repetition. Through the careful conversion of crisis into routine.

He still refuses to play Scattergories.

Over the past few weeks, at various social gatherings, adults have been telling Zaynab how brave she is. This happens with the particular frequency that suggests people have been discussing her situation when she’s not around, working up the courage to say something meaningful when they see her.

“You’re so brave,” they say, with the kind of intensity usually reserved for war heroes or cancer survivors. “What you’re doing for your father—it’s just incredible.”

Zaynab has developed a standard response to this. She nods politely and says thank you, but I can see her testing the word against her own experience of what is actually happening.

“I don’t feel brave,” she told me yesterday. “I mean, I’ll be asleep the whole time. I won’t even feel it.”

This struck me as a more accurate assessment than all the adult pronouncements about courage and sacrifice. She has distilled the experience down to its essential components: anesthesia, unconsciousness, recovery. The drama exists mainly in other people’s imaginations.

“Maybe bravery is just doing something that needs to be done,” I said.

“Maybe,” she said. “Or maybe people just need it to be braver than it is.”

On graduation day, Zaynab wore her white dress under her black gown. She had gotten dressed at her friend Kangyi’s house with Ria and Carolina, and they had coordinated their outfits weeks in advance for the TikTok video they planned to make afterward.

When I saw her at the ceremony, the white dress was invisible beneath the graduation gown, but I knew it was there—the way you know someone is wearing jewelry under their clothes or has painted their toenails inside closed shoes. It was preparation for what came after the official moment, evidence of a parallel ceremony that would unfold in her own vernacular.

During the ceremony itself, sitting in Constitution Hall listening to names being read in alphabetical order, I found myself thinking about the white dress underneath the black gown, about the gold line traced under her French manicure. About all the small ways we prepare for transformation without knowing if transformation will actually come.

This is when I started thinking about other calendars entirely—about the ones that don’t track progress so much as presence.

The lunar calendar that shapes our religious life moves according to different principles than the Gregorian one we use to structure our secular lives. It follows the moon rather than the sun, which means it gains eleven days each year on our solar calendar. This creates a kind of temporal drift, a slow but constant slippage between sacred time and ordinary time.

I have always found this slippage comforting, the way it refuses to let religious observance settle into the same dates year after year. Ramadan migrates through the seasons—sometimes falling in winter when the days are short and the fasting is easy, sometimes in summer when nineteen hours without water becomes a form of endurance training. The unpredictability seems intentional, a reminder that time is not a container we fill but a current we enter.

Five times a day, we stop what we are doing to pray. Not because we have scheduled prayer into our day planner, but because the day planner is interrupted by prayer. The call to prayer doesn’t care if you are in a meeting or on a deadline or in the middle of your daughter’s graduation ceremony. It cares only that you remember, for five minutes, what you are doing here.

This is time that refuses to be neutral.

Three days ago, Zaynab asked if she could get a third ear piercing.

“For what occasion?” I asked.

“No occasion,” she said. “I just want one.”

This was vintage Zaynab—the way she can state her desires with perfect clarity while simultaneously making it clear that explaining them would be beneath her dignity.

“Where?” I asked.

She pointed to the upper part of her ear. “Here. Just a small one.”

“When?”

“After the thing on Tuesday. When I’m recovered.”

I waited for her to elaborate, to connect the piercing to the procedure in some meaningful way, but she had already moved on to scrolling through her phone, apparently considering the conversation closed.

Later, I found myself thinking about this exchange, about the way she had situated the piercing in time—after Tuesday, but not because of Tuesday. As if she understood something about marking time that I was still trying to figure out. Not a commemoration, exactly. Just a way of marking that she was here.

The night of graduation, we luxuriated in our newly installed backyard hot tub, admiring the fireflies lighting up our neighbor’s tall trees. The water was exactly the right temperature, and the air smelled like the distant promise of summer storms.

“Next week,” Zaynab said.

“Next week,” I agreed.

“Then what?”

This struck me as the most honest question she had asked in weeks. Not about the procedure itself, but about what comes after. What fills the space between Tuesday and September, between the thing we’re doing and the thing that comes next.

“I don’t know,” I said.

She held up her hand, and the gold line under her French manicure caught the light from the house, glinting almost invisibly against the dark water. You had to know it was there to see it.

The concept of barakah suggests that blessing multiplies quietly, without announcement, in the spaces between more obvious forms of grace. In conversations about bravery that aren’t really about bravery. In white dresses worn under black gowns. In the refusal to play Scattergories even when your daughter is making elaborate bargains. In stories that run alongside the stamped dates.

Maybe this is what Zaynab understands that I am still learning: that time is not neutral, but it is also not dramatic. It is simply dense with possibility, dense with the weight of what we choose to mark and what we choose to let be.

Tuesday will arrive, and with it the marrow transfer, the ice chips, the recalibrating of the body’s clock. Shabbir’s blood will begin its quiet transformation. Zaynab will rest. And we’ll find ourselves in a space that’s unfamiliar—not yet recovery, not quite the next chapter. Just the strange middle: between summer and September, between one version of our family and whatever is coming.

But tonight, in the hot tub, with the fireflies and the promise of storms, we are living in the space between events. And that space turns out to be exactly the right size for what we actually have: each other, the water at exactly the right temperature, and the knowledge that some things reveal themselves only when the light hits them just right.

June 17th will be many things. A medical procedure. A new birthday. Close enough to Father’s Day that it hums with its echo. For now, though, it is still just a date on the calendar, holding its weight quietly, waiting for us to notice what we’ve always known: that time moves not in circles but in accumulations, not in completion but in continuation.

The fireflies blink on and off. The water holds us. Somewhere, a neighbor laughs. Zaynab’s nails catch the light.

Subscribe now

The morning after our anniversary dinner, Friedrich Nietzsche turned up in my Substack feed. The algorithm had its reasons.

Marriage as a long conversation. When entering a marriage, one should ask the question: do you think you will be able to have good conversations with this woman right into old age? Everything else in marriage is transitory, but most of the time in interaction is spent in conversation.

I stared at the screen, coffee growing cold in my hands, remembering the conversation from the night before. Our friends—nine years married to our nineteen—had asked what advice we might offer. Now here was Nietzsche, echoing the very heart of what we’d tried to say.

And then Haroon, whom I followed on Substack, reposted the same quote. That familiar flutter of recognition stirred—a sign, or ayah, as we Muslims say. In Islam, signs are the language of God, written into the fabric of everyday life. When the universe speaks twice in one morning, you pay attention.

I found myself returning to the question I hadn’t quite voiced the night before: what holds a marriage together—not in its ordinary seasons, but in the extraordinary ones, when life cracks open and remakes you?

The restaurant specialized in Mediterranean food—the kind of place where you order too many small plates and spend the evening picking at hummus and labneh while the conversation unfolds in layers. Our friends, Sarah and Omar, moved through their meal with the easy choreography of a couple comfortable in each other’s rhythms.

“What’s the secret?” Sarah asked, spearing a piece of roasted cauliflower. “You two seem to have figured something out.”

Shabbir and I exchanged that practiced glance of the long-married—equal parts amusement and caution.

“Encourage each other’s endeavors,” I said after a pause. “Create space for the other person to grow.”

Shabbir, unprompted, jumped in with parenting advice instead. He launched into a story about the trip we took to Turkey when our youngest was just a year old—how they should embrace complex trips as a whole family, not wait for the perfect age or stage.

I looked at him. “That’s great,” I said, “but we’re supposed to be giving marriage advice.”

He grinned, unabashed. “Food coma. That’s all I’ve got for now.”

I watched Sarah’s face as I spoke, realizing I was articulating something we had long practiced but never quite named. “There’s this societal expectation,” I said, “that marriage and kids should put an end to adventure. But in my case, it was marriage that made new adventures possible.”

It struck me even as I said it: we’d built a marriage that operates on abundance, not scarcity—the more space Shabbir gave me to grow, the more I wanted to pour back into our shared life. Space breeds generosity, not selfishness.

I thought of the seven years when he traveled weekly for consulting—a sacrifice made bearable by the freedom he’d always cultivated for me. I respected how hard he worked, the stability he built for us. But that kind of travel takes its toll. I chose to frame it through gratitude, though I knew how easily it could tip toward resentment or loneliness.

And now the roles are shifting. My career is moving into a stage that will soon involve regular travel, public work, new demands on time and presence. We’re already having the early back-and-forth about it—his unease, my pull toward this next phase, both of us still learning what it will mean. It’s a different kind of conversation now—not the seamless ones born of shared values, but the messier kind, where values meet circumstance.

“We took turns being the anchor,” I said, spooning out more fattoush. “Someone has to hold things steady while the other reaches.”

Omar nodded thoughtfully. “We’ve started to feel that shift too,” he said. “In the early years it was all about setting up life—house, kids, finances. Now it’s more about making space for each other to explore what’s next.”

Sarah set down her fork. “The thing is,” she said, her voice softening, “someday it’ll be just the two of us again. The kids will leave, the careers will wind down. We’ll be sitting across from each other at breakfast. We’d better have something to talk about.”

“We’re getting an early preview of that now,” Shabbir said quietly.

The architecture of our life has changed in ways neither of us imagined. A year ago, we had one set of rhythms. Now, it’s a different tempo altogether—more time at home, more hours in conversation, more hours alone.

While I work, Shabbir wanders, ponders, interrupts with questions ranging from profound to delightfully absurd.

“Do you think our children will remember this as a hard time or a rich time?” he’ll ask, appearing in the doorway with a cup of chai.

Or: “Why do so many men struggle with vulnerability?” he’ll muse, mid-spoonful, as he piles biryani onto his plate or surveys the snack options in our pantry.

The man who once optimized spreadsheets now excavates philosophy with equal zeal. And I’m reminded of how we first met—not in person, but through AOL Instant Messenger, where we spent hours talking philosophy before we’d ever seen each other’s faces. Time would vanish. Words built the first architecture of us.

Some of those questions still turn into conversations—longer, slower than the ones we used to have. About care, about how men do or don’t talk about vulnerability, about what kind of life—intellectual and otherwise—can be built inside whatever new structure life offers next.

That, too, is part of the long conversation. Not because things are resolved, but because they aren’t—and the terms are always shifting.

Sarah was right. Someday it will be just us, sitting across from each other at breakfast. But sometimes “someday” arrives early, and you find yourself in the middle of the next negotiation: who you are becoming now, and what the conversation between you will need to hold.

When Nietzsche’s words appeared in my feed, my first thought was of surveillance capitalism—how our devices mirror our preoccupations back to us.

In Islam, we believe that God communicates through signs for those who know how to read them. Sometimes a sign is a sunset that stops you in your tracks, sometimes it’s a verse from the Qur’an that speaks directly to your current struggle. Sometimes it’s a nineteenth-century German philosopher appearing twice in one morning to validate a conversation you had about marriage the night before.

And perhaps it doesn’t matter whether the source is divine orchestration or algorithmic coincidence. Maybe God speaks through search engines now. Maybe the universe has learned to use our technology not just to sell us things, but to remind us of truths we’ve momentarily forgotten.

Or maybe Haroon simply has impeccable timing and a philosophical bent.

Either way: Nietzsche was right. Marriage is a long conversation, and you’d best choose someone whose mind will still surprise and delight you when careers are over, the house is quiet, and you’re left with nothing but words and time.

Subscribe now

It’s Tuesday afternoon. My laptop sits open on the kitchen counter, email notifications stacking up like dishes in the sink. Constitutional law casebooks tower nearby, syllabi drafts sprawled across the dining table. Just weeks ago, I was celebrating a tenure-track offer—the beginning of everything I’d spent years reaching toward.

Until recently, this scene would have included Shabbir’s laptop too—multiple monitors glowing, his phone buzzing with investor calls. The corporate executive who generated three business ideas before breakfast, whose days ran on pitch decks and quarterly projections.

Then came the diagnosis.

“Oh, don’t mind me,” Shabbir sighs from the couch, gently fluffing the tufts of post-chemo fuzz at his crown. “I’m just over here ... wasting away... while you type away at your little computer.”

I look up. “You literally just spent twenty minutes examining your scalp in the bathroom mirror.”

“That was research. I think my hair’s coming back thicker. What if chemo gave me Bollywood hair?”

This is our new normal: cancer with a side of obsessive self-examination—sometimes philosophical, sometimes just about his hairline.

Subscribe now

The Art of Productive Interruptions

Shabbir has perfected the office pop-in. Just when I’m deep in case law, parsing the Due Process Clause, his head appears in the doorway like a curious meerkat.

“Quick question,” he says—which is never true. “Do you think the desi community’s pessimism is actually about protecting the group rather than the individual?”

“Shabbir, I’m literally mid-sentence.”

“But people act suspicious when I’m not miserable. Like I’m violating some unwritten grief contract.”

“We can unpack this after I finish the paragraph.”

“Sure, sure.” He turns to leave. Then pivots. “But also—why do you think my dad keeps bringing up drumsticks? Not chicken drumsticks, but the weird vegetable from Bismillah 355. And goat liver. And pomegranates, but specifically California pomegranates. Is it about love? Control? The antioxidant industrial complex?”

We both know what he’s doing. The philosophical spirals are easier than naming the fear that sits between us like a third roommate who never does the dishes. So we overthink our way through it, turn anxiety into abstract questions neither of us really needs answered.

A verse from the Qur’an surfaces in my mind: “Shall We inform you of the greatest losers as to their deeds? They are those whose effort is lost in worldly life, while they think they are doing well in work.” — Surah Kahf

I used to read it as a warning against blind ambition. But watching Shabbir navigate illness with such deliberate curiosity, I wonder if it’s about more than that. Maybe the “greatest losers” are those who mistake motion for meaning—who confuse productivity with purpose.

His questions aren’t distractions. They’re excavations.

The Great Caregiver Rotation Debate

Some mornings, I wake before dawn to write lectures no one will hear for months. These hours aren’t stolen—they’re sacred. I’m building a future not in defiance of illness, but in dialogue with it.

Shabbir emerges soon after, stretching like a cat.

“I think we should revisit the post-transplant caregiver schedule,” he announces, as if proposing a road trip.

The logistics are more complex than they first appeared. After his bone marrow transplant at Johns Hopkins, he’ll need to stay in Baltimore for two months of monitoring. The kids and I will remain home, 90 minutes away, because post-transplant patients can’t share caregivers with children. So, we’re choreographing a dance of distance: me shuttling between two lives, him learning to accept help from friends and family members who’ll rotate through his Baltimore apartment like actors in an ongoing play.

“We have a plan,” I remind him. “We have a backup. And a backup to the backup.”

“I know,” he says brightly. “But what if Hina has to go back to work? What if Moon Auntie can’t figure out how to get me to the appointments? What if—”

What he doesn’t say—but I hear anyway—is that imagining every outcome is how he steadies himself. Anxiety dressed up as logistical enthusiasm.

Parallel Universes of Exhaustion

Last night, I was building PowerPoint slides about the Establishment Clause at 1 a.m. when Shabbir wandered in.

“Can’t sleep,” he said. “Everyone keeps saying I’m ‘so positive’—like it’s weird. Am I performing wellness?”

“Shabbir, it’s 1 a.m.”

“But seriously, why does jovial equal suspicious in the cancer community? Like I’m supposed to be morose to be authentic?”

He leaned against the doorframe, clearly settling in. “You know what your problem is? You compartmentalize. I integrate. My cancer thoughts and my regular thoughts are one big thought smoothie.”

“My problem is that your thought smoothie has terrible timing.”

“Fair. But have you considered there’s no good time for cancer thoughts?”

I deliver my most withering glare.

The Greatest Losers, Reconsidered

Illness has made one thing clear: not all labor is visible.

When Shabbir apologizes from the daybed near my desk—“I’m sorry I can’t do more”—I think of the war inside him. Cells multiplying. Immune systems recalibrating. Healing is his job now.

“Your body is in full-time employment,” I tell him.

He nods. “Productive fatigue. That’s a thing, right?”

It is now.

Maybe Surah Kahf isn’t a rebuke of ambition but an invitation to examine its foundation. Shabbir’s stillness isn’t surrender; it’s a different kind of striving. His questions are a form of precision—a slow, curious kind of faith.

His chemo and my casebooks are parallel devotions. Both require patience, strategy, and a willingness to trust in processes larger than ourselves.

When my offer came in—tenure-track, finally—we toasted like the future had stopped shifting. That illusion didn’t last. But I still draft syllabi. Still write. Because to do the work, even in uncertainty, is to believe in a future worth meeting.

And maybe that belief is a kind of worship—not of success, but of possibility.

Epilogue of a Daybed

Shabbir still dreams up new schedules. Still watches me work from the daybed. Still asks too many questions.

“Will you still love me if I have better hair than you?” he asked the other day, not joking.

“Please. Your hair game is strong, but genetics are cruel.”

He laughed—a real laugh. Bright. Weightless.

In this collision of timelines and to-do lists, something honest is being stitched together—not a perfect career or a perfect caregiving record, but a life. The lecture prep and the philosophical detours. The ambition and the care. The urgency and the awe.

And maybe that’s enough—even if we revisit the caregiver schedule one more time.

Leave a comment

When my husband, Shabbir, called to tell me his blood work showed something concerning and I needed to come to the emergency room, my body knew before my mind did. The familiar tightness in my chest. The way my hands suddenly felt too heavy to hold the phone. The strange distance between my voice saying, “I’ll be right there,” and the part of me already bracing for impact.

It was 2006 when my father was diagnosed with terminal liver cancer—a 13cm tumor discovered during what was supposed to be a routine ER visit. Nineteen years later, walking through similar sliding glass doors, I carried his death with me like an extra shadow. My body remembered exactly how this story could end.

But here’s what I didn’t expect: I wasn’t the only one whose body held that memory.

When Everyone’s Past Shows Up Uninvited

Our neighbors across the street—parents from our kids’ private school located miles away—took over our impossibly long daily commute without being asked. They came with prayers and food. But I could see the weight of our news settling into familiar grooves in their faces. She’d battled aggressive breast cancer during COVID lockdown. Sophia could text me, checking in regularly, but couldn’t face me in person yet. The weight of what was happening felt crushing for her, laden as it was with her own memories.

My father-in-law arrived within hours, having driven from several states away. He’d lost his wife to breast cancer fourteen years ago and had built an entirely new life. But here he was again, pacing the hospital room with restless energy, wondering how he kept finding himself in this place. How to help when there was nothing to fix. The familiar helplessness of loving someone the doctors were examining.

My mother became fiercely protective of our story. When well-meaning acquaintances tried to discuss Shabbir’s diagnosis with her, she bristled. “It’s none of their business,” she’d say, almost angry. It felt like an invasion to her. She’d been through this before, had learned the hard way how other people’s processing of your tragedy can become its own burden.

That tension—between people’s instinct to help and the emotional freight they bring—became one of our hardest lessons. It wasn’t just our crisis anymore. It was everyone’s.

Joy as Declaration

Shabbir struggled with these reactions more than he struggled with the diagnosis itself. He didn’t want to be pitied. He didn’t want a sense of foreboding to surround him. He wasn’t interested in becoming the center of a circle of worry.

“I’m still here,” he’d say when people spoke to him in hushed, careful tones. “I’m still me.”

We made a choice then, conscious and deliberate: joy would be our rebellion against everyone else’s triggered grief. Not denial—Shabbir is fully engaged with his medical care, completely aware of what we’re facing. But he refuses to let other people’s trauma-memories define his experience.

When friends approach with the weighted solemnity they reserve for cancer patients, he deflects with humor. When they speak in hushed tones about treatment, he talks about our upcoming trip to Universal’s new Epic Universe park.

“Their grief doesn’t have to be mine,” he says. It’s a boundary I’m still learning to draw.

Subscribe now

The Practical Expertise of Shared Suffering

Sophia didn’t just bring any food—she brought the comfort foods that had gotten her through chemo. Sugary cardamom tea. Eye masks for the hospital stays. Earplugs for sleeping through the constant beeping of machines. Small things that only someone who’d been there would think to include. Her trauma had become our survival kit.

My sister-in-law, Hina, and her husband—both healthcare professionals who had also suffered the loss of my mother-in-law—arrived with specific questions for the oncologist and knowledge about navigating insurance authorizations. They knew which tests to push for, which second opinions mattered, the difference between good news delivered cautiously and bad news delivered gently.

Our extended community—many with their own medical expertise—offered to help, advise, connect us with others who could guide us. A hospitalist helped cut through emergency room red tape, moving through the hospital with the authority to make things happen. Oncologists called in favors across specialties. An ophthalmologist appeared when Shabbir ’s eyes began to redden after chemo.

This was our community weaving itself into a safety net, each thread strengthened by someone’s own walk through medical crisis.

The Weight of Everyone’s History

What strikes me is how crisis accumulates in spaces, in relationships, in families.

My father-in-law has now been the man pacing hospital corridors twice—first for a wife, now for a son. Hina has watched cancer take her mother and now threaten her brother. Each of us carries not just our own experience of loss, but the accumulated weight of watching others navigate similar paths.

Sophia can navigate any cancer center blindfolded. She knows which parking garages fill up first, which cafeterias have decent coffee, how to read the subtle expressions that cross nurses’ faces. This knowledge is earned through suffering, stored in muscle memory, ready to activate when someone else joins this unwanted fellowship.

But there’s something else happening: Shabbir and I realized we were becoming the couple our friends think of first when someone they know gets diagnosed. We’re the living proof that you can hear those words and still be here, still planning vacations, still arguing about whose turn it is to take out the trash.

Our insistence on continuing to live had become other people’s permission to hope.

Building Forward

What I see now is that we’re all part of an invisible network, connected by experiences none of us wanted. Each crisis becomes part of the infrastructure for the next—not just the trauma, but the solutions.

I see how our experience will ripple forward: in the comfort foods we’ll remember to bring the next family, in the specific advice we’ll be able to offer, in the permission we’ll give others to keep living fully even in the middle of crisis.

And I see something else, too: that the body doesn’t just remember pain. It remembers how to care, how to show up, how to hold others the way we were held. The body carries not just the shadow of past losses, but the muscle memory of resilience.

That, too, is part of the story.

Leave a comment

When I published a piece about finding God in the ordinary moments of my husband’s cancer treatment during Ramadan—in washing his weakened body, in the careful preparation of soft foods he might tolerate—I thought I was writing into the void. Just one Muslim woman trying to make sense of how crisis had rewritten everything I thought I knew about faith and devotion.

Then the messages started coming. Not just from Muslims, but from people of all backgrounds who saw themselves in my words. Parents caring for aging mothers, spouses navigating mental illness, friends figuring out how to be present for families in crisis. People who’d felt the strange transformation that happens when the ordinary becomes profoundly meaningful, when pettiness and deep love coexist in the same exhausted afternoon.

“I thought I was the only one,” said one reader, “who found God in letting my daughter be furious.”

Another said, “You put words to something I couldn’t name—how serving someone’s body can feel like worship.”

That’s when I realized: we’re all building something.

Not just those of us in moments of acute crisis, but all of us, every day, navigating the weight of care. Trying to explain to a child why daddy needs so much rest. Watching a teenager turn fear into fierce protectiveness. Standing in awe as an 18-year-old calmly chooses to become a bone marrow donor for her father.

We’re all architects of care in some form—whether we’re literally washing someone’s back or fumbling through small talk when we really just want to be antisocial.

This newsletter is for all of it.

The sacred and the mundane. The moments when faith feels crystal clear and the ones when it’s buried under layers of complicated emotions about showing up for people when you’re running on empty. The times when love feels like a superpower and the times when it feels like a task you’re constantly behind on.

I write from a Muslim perspective because that’s who I am—and because I’ve noticed how rarely our voices appear in conversations about meaning-making, resilience, and what it looks like to live with purpose. The self-help industry offers optimization and empowerment, but Islamic spirituality asks for something different entirely: submission, community obligation, finding the divine in the details of daily life. This texture remains largely absent from mainstream discussions about how we make sense of suffering and joy, yet it offers a radically different approach than the typical “manifest your best life” narratives.

But the truths I’m exploring transcend religious boundaries. They’re about what it means to build structures sturdy enough to hold each other’s humanity. To rebuild when those structures inevitably fall apart. To find glimpses of the divine in places we never thought to look—not just in mosque or church or temple, but in hospital corridors; in watching your children grapple with their father’s diagnosis in their own clumsy, brave ways; in the moment when someone who’s been avoiding human contact suddenly needs to be held.

Some weeks I’ll write about literal caregiving. Others will explore the emotional architecture we construct around difficult people in our lives, or how to maintain any semblance of self when everyone needs something from you.

I’ll write about the petty thoughts that creep in during profound moments. About how grief makes you weirdly funny. About the guilt that comes with wanting space when someone you love is suffering. About how sometimes the most spiritual thing you can do is allow yourself to be completely human—irritated, overwhelmed, wanting things to be different than they are.

Faith, not as escape, but as invitation

In Islamic tradition, we have this concept of ihsan—excellence in worship, but also a kind of awareness that you are always being watched by the divine, not in a punitive way but in a way that elevates the smallest actions. Taking care of someone becomes an act of devotion. Preparing food becomes a form of prayer. Even cleaning up someone else’s mess (literally or metaphorically) can be transformed into something meaningful when you realize you’re participating in something larger than yourself.

Faith isn’t an escape from difficulty; it’s an invitation into deeper engagement with it. It asks you to see every person as carrying something sacred, even when they’re being difficult. Even when you’re being difficult.

But I don’t want to make it sound more noble than it is. Sometimes taking care of someone is just exhausting. Sometimes you do it with resentment or mechanical efficiency. Sometimes you fail at it entirely. The beauty isn’t in getting it right—it’s in the way life keeps offering you chances to try again, to resurrect something new from the ruins of your last attempt.

When one voice echoes many

I’m still learning that my small, specific experiences somehow illuminate truths others recognize but couldn’t quite articulate. That’s the mystery and gift of writing: how our most particular moments become doorways for others to walk through.

This is a space for the whole mess of it—for finding God in the bathroom and losing your mind in the grocery store, for the sacred wrapped up in the ridiculous, for the times when everything clicks and the times when nothing does.

Welcome to the architecture of care.

Subscribe now