4 Comments
User's avatar
D.E. Skogen's avatar

Is it strange that the Loving Court did not address the punishment assigned by the lower court? That is, not being permitted to reenter the state of Virginia, together, for 25 years? This seems like it would infringe upon the Equal Protection Clause or maybe the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments. Or did the Court choose to ignore this issue because it might distract from what they recognized as a more important and fundamental right?

Expand full comment
A. Uddin - www.profuddin.com's avatar

Good question, and you’re right, that 25-year banishment is shocking. The Court didn’t really need to address it separately, though, because once it struck down Virginia’s interracial-marriage law as unconstitutional, all the punishments tied to it automatically fell away. I think the justices focused on the bigger point that the state had no right to criminalize the marriage itself.

Still, the punishment does show just how far Virginia went to enforce racial boundaries, which makes the Court’s ruling feel even more powerful.

Expand full comment
Mustafa Gurbuz's avatar

“Liberty and dignity travel together”—eloquently stated!

Expand full comment
A. Uddin - www.profuddin.com's avatar

Thank you! I love how that phrase captures the Court’s deeper insight—that personal freedom isn’t just about choice, but about being recognized as fully human. Liberty lets you decide; dignity ensures that decision is respected.

Expand full comment