Discussion about this post

User's avatar
khatoon's avatar

When you say that "the document’s deliberate ambiguity wasn’t a flaw but a key feature, and it depended on leaders respecting the system even when breaking it might offer short-term advantage," I can't help but think of this the other way around.

What if the the document’s deliberate ambiguity was a key feature specifically BECAUSE it allowed leaders to buck against the system for short-term advantage. Is there any evidence that the framers were particularly optimistic about the goodwill of America's future leaders? Or is there a chance that they relied on norms with the intention that they could be broken without steep judicial consequence?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts